Power Independence Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

 Moderated by: Joe Kelley
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Identity Theft  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Thu May 12th, 2016 06:06 pm
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6408
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/stealing-the-identity-of-the-confederation-known-as-the-united-states-of-america-05-04-16.pdf

Cut and pasted from the above link:

Stealing the identity of the confederation known as
"The United States of America"
We at Union States Assembly search for the truth of history, no matter where it may lead. As for the
truth of history regarding the “American Experiment” for independence and freedom, the best source of
truth are the Journals of the Continental Congress (all 34 volumes), the Secret Journals of the Acts and
Proceedings of the Continental Congress (all 4 volumes), and the “Genuine Information” portion of the
Secret Proceedings and Debates of the Federal Convention (1st chapter). All of this information is
displayed on our, the Union States Assembly, website and can be found at
http://www.unionstatesassembly.org.
1) Let’s start with the document known as the Declaration of Independence. This document functions
as a notice. It is NOT a law form. It details specific grievances of the colonists with respect to the king of
Great Britain. Since those grievances had been ignored, the colonists then laid out their intentions in
the form of a notice, i.e., declaration. They were to become independent states, each on par with Great
Britain, France, Spain, Sweden, etc., and they were severing all political ties, etc. with the state of Great
Britain and the King of Great Britain, thus becoming sovereigns themselves. Anyone who believes
otherwise probably has not read the document and is obviously uninformed.
Let us ignore the grievances and go to the last paragraph. This paragraph is of the utmost importance
for what they were actually declaring, not what you have been told they were declaring. The European
world of monarchs, Popes, despots, etc., of the 1700’s acknowledged basically 3 things: states (or
nations), colonies (sometime also called provinces), and possessions. There was nothing on the planet
called territories at this time. Also, the word country was rarely, if at all, used in descriptions.
Thus, when the Framers declared “That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States . . . and the State of Great Britain . . .” they were telling the world that those 13
Colonies, are no longer colonies and that they are independent States, even from each other, and they
are all on a par with the “State of Great Britain” (which is NOT a nation either, it is a collection of
nations), the State of France, the State of Sweden, etc., etc.
2) The “Framers” DID NOT declare they intended to create a singular nation, county, or republic. Each
State was a nation unto itself and fully independent. Good luck finding any concrete evidence to show
that a singular country, nation, or republic was ever created. That would mean that each nation (state)
would have to give up its sovereignty, as well as with the people in such state. This would NEVER have
been approved. As such, it has NEVER been approved.

3) Each of these States had created their own law form during the time frame of 1776 through March 1,
1781, as they were independent of each other. Some states (10) called these constitutions and others
(3) used modified versions of kings/queens charters.
4) On November 15, 1777, Congress agreed to the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union and
sent it to the 13 nations (states) for their ratification. The name of the confederation is "The United
States of America" as referenced in Article 1. It is a confederation of nations and is not a singular nation,
as clearly referenced in Article 2 where “each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence .
. .”. In Article 3 it is says “. . . league of friendship”. A league, as was intended, is a compact or contract.
Thus the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union is an international treaty among those 13
nations (states, not the people), a compact between the states, with the type of government being a
federal confederacy run by Congress. The Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union is the law form
(constitution) for the confederacy of States (not the people because the people has their various
constitutions, etc.). This compact was fully ratified by all 13 nations (states) on March 1, 1781.
5) On January 28, 1782, Congress resolves to acknowledge Vermont as a free and independent state
and accept them into the Union, on equal footing, as the 14th state, provided they accede to the Articles
of Confederation and perpetual Union and the boundaries between New York and New Hampshire as
specified. This clearly demonstrates that Congress was able to use the Articles of Confederation and
perpetual Union to bring on new entries into the Union. (See Volume 22, page numbers 58-60).
This clearly demonstrates that Congress has determined that the Articles of Confederation and
perpetual Union has the built in capabilities to bring new entries into the Union. This squashes any
notion that it does not and therefore, some other “document” must be used to expand the Union, i.e.,
the Constitution for the United States. This also squashes any notion that the new members must be
brought in through the Northwest Ordinance.
If you think that new entries into the Union must come in through the Northwest Ordinance, then you
probably have not read the documents and are obviously uninformed . The Northwest Ordinance was
written in 1787. Yet, here it is in 1782 and with the war still going on, and Congress says their federal
constitution, i.e., the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union, has the capability built into it to
invite new members into the Union. The same argument be used against the Constitution for the
United States bring required to invite new members in to the Union.
6) April 26, 1783, Congress in an address to the States wrote “. . . the greatest trust ever confided to a
political society . . .”, thus establishing that the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union (and thus
the Confederation known as "The United States of America") is a trust created for the benefit of the
sovereign states, and thereby, the sovereign people populating them. (See Volume 24, pages 277-283)
It is NOT a national trust as there is NO singular nation. It is not a corporate trust as there is no
corporation. It is a trust where the States are the beneficiaries and Congress will act as the trustees.
7) January 14, 1784 the Treaty of Paris is ratified by Congress. The Revolutionary war officially ends.
However, unmentioned in the debates of this treaty is no provision for the King of Great Britain to
actually cede land to "The United States of America", as had been the practice of past treaties among
sovereigns (see Treaty of Paris 1763 and how the King of France cedes land to the victor, the King of
Great Britain). Word trickery is used such as “relinquishes all claims to the Government, Propriety, and
Territorial Rights of the same and every Part thereof” but there is no mention of ceding the land and
giving allodial title to the Americans, again, as was the practice in previous treaties. Thus, the states and
Americans are now sovereign but own no title to any land. (See Volume 26, pages 22-31).
8) On March 1, 1784 the Committee appointed to prepare a plan for the temporary government of the
western territory has agreed to the following resolutions (See Volume 26, pages 118-120):
“Resolved, . . .
That whensoever any of the said States shall have, of free inhabitants as many as shall then be in any
one the least numerous of the thirteen original States, such State shall be admitted by its Delegates into
the Congress of the United States, on an equal footing with the said original States, after which the
assent of two thirds of the United States in Congress assembled shall be requisite in all those cases,
wherein by the Confederation, the assent of nine States is now required, provided the consent of nine
States to such admission may be obtained according to the eleventh of the Articles of Confederation.
Until such admission by their Delegates into Congress, any of the said States, after the establishment of
their temporary government, shall have authority to keep a sitting member in Congress, with a right of
debating, but not of voting . . . That the preceding articles shall be formed into a charter of compact,
shall be duly executed by the President of the U.S. in Congress assembled under his hand and the seal of
the United States, shall be promulgated and shall stand as fundamental constitutions between the
thirteen original States, and those now newly described, unalterable but by the joint consent of the U.S.
in Congress assembled and of the particular State within such alteration is proposed to be made.”
Clearly, the Congressional Committee is using the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union to bring
new entries into the Union. That is their intention. In fact, the Congressional Committee is clarifying the
way the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union will be used after there are more than 13 states
in the Union.
On April 23, 1784 Congress takes up the recommendations of the aforesaid Committee of March 1,
1784, and after debate, resolves (makes federal law) (See Volume 26, pages 274-279):
“ . . . That whensoever any of the said states shall have, of free inhabitants, as many as shall then be in
any one the least numerous of the thirteen Original states, such State shall be admitted by its delegates
into the Congress of the United States, on an equal footing with the said original states’ provided nine
states agree to such admission, according to the reservation of the eleventh of the Articles of
Confederation the consent of so many states in Congress is first obtained as may at the time be
competent to such admission. And in order to adapt the said Articles of Confederation to the state of Congress when its numbers shall be thus increased, it shall be proposed to the legislatures of the states,
originally parties thereto, to require the assent of two-thirds of the United States in Congress assembled,
in all those cases wherein, by the said articles, the assent of nine states is now required, which being
agreed to by them, shall be binding on the new states. Until such admission by their delegates into
Congress, any of the said states, after the establishment of their temporary government, shall have
authority to keep a member in Congress, with a right of debating but not of voting.
[That measures not inconsistent with the principles of the Confederation, and necessary for the
preservation of peace and good order among the settlers in any of the said new states, until they shall
assume a temporary government as aforesaid, may, from time to time, be taken by the United States in
Congress assembled.] That the preceding articles shall be formed into a charter of compact; shall be duly
executed by the President of the United States in Congress assembled, under his hand, and the seal for
the United States; shall be promulgated; and shall stand as fundamental constitutions between the
thirteen original states, and each of the several states now newly described, unalterable [from and after
the sale of any part of the territory of such State, pursuant to this resolve] but by the joint consent of the
United States in Congress assembled, and of the particular State within which such alteration is
proposed.”
Notice the intent of Congress and the strikeout of certain words to CLEARLY see Congress’ intentions.
Congress intends to use the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union to bring new entries into the
Union and has made provisions for when the Union is expanded beyond the original 13.
After the 2nd Congressional action (1st was Vermont in 1782) to provide a path for new entries into the
Union, it is clear Congress (and thus the States) feel the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union
as written and after a Congressional resolution (federal law) for when the Union is larger than 13, has
provisions to bring new entries into the Union. No other documentation is needed.
10) June 4, 1784 Congress adjourns and “A Committee of the States” runs the confederation in
Congress’s absence. It is abolished a few months later due to lack of participation. This is the ONLY time
this Committee was ever formed. (See Volume 27, page 561). Do not make the mistake of what
happened later with the federal government has something to do with “A Committee of the States”.
Notice this committee is called “A Committee of the States” and NOT “the Committee of the States".
11) May 16, 1785, the State of Franklin petitions for Statehood but is not admitted into the Union. The
State of Franklin was an autonomous, secessionist United States territory created not long after the end
of the American Revolution from territory that later was ceded by North Carolina to the federal
government. Franklin's territory later became part of the state of Tennessee. Franklin was never
officially admitted into the Union of the United States and existed for only four years. Congress was
heavily in debt at the close of the Revolutionary War, the state of North Carolina voted, in April 1784,
"to give Congress the 29,000,000 acres lying between the Allegheny Mountains (as the entire
Appalachian range was then called) and the Mississippi river." This did not please the Watauga settlers
who had gained an earnest foothold on the Cumberland River at Fort Nashborough. They feared Congress might in desperation sell the territory to a foreign power such as France or Spain. A few
months later, the Legislature of North Carolina withdrew its gift, and again took charge of its western
land because it feared the land would not be used to pay the debts of Congress.
October 1785 the Virginia legislature passed an act entitled “An Act concerning the erection of the
District of Kentucky into an Independent State”.
12) September 11, 1786 the Annapolis Convention takes place to determine interstate commerce and
ways for the federal government to raise the money required to pay the debts incurred. Although all
states are invited to send delegates, only five states send them. The Convention recommends to
Congress to have another convention to meet in May to “devise such further provisions as shall appear
to them necessary to render the constitution of the Federal Government adequate to the exigencies of
the Union; and to report such an Act for that purpose to the United States in Congress assembled, as
when “agreed to by them and” afterwards confirmed by the Legislatures of every State will effectually
provide for the same.” (See Volume 31, pages 677-680).
This follows the guidelines laid out in Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union
regarding alterations therewith by agreeing that changes first be proposed and agreed to in Congress
before being passed to the states for their assent.
February 21, 1787 amid calls for a stronger central government, due in part to Shays' Rebellion, and any
other short comings in regards to raising the revenue required to fund the federal government and pay
the debts incurred, Congress endorses a resolution calling for a convention to be held in Philadelphia,
beginning in May in the words following: “Whereas there is provision in the Articles of Confederation and
perpetual Union for making alterations therein by the Assent of a Congress of the United States and of
the legislatures of the several States (emphasis added); And whereas experience hath evinced that there
are defects in the present Confederation, as a mean to remedy which several of the states and
particularly the state of New York by express instructions to their delegates in Congress have suggested a
Convention for the purposes expressed in the following resolution and such Convention appearing to be
the most probable mean of establishing in these states a firm national government.
Resolved that in the opinion of Congress it is expedient that on the second Monday in May next a
Convention of delegates who shall have been appointed by the several States to be held at Philadelphia
for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation (emphasis added) and
reporting to Congress and the several legislatures such alterations and provisions therein as shall when
agreed to in Congress (emphasis added) and confirmed by the States render the federal Constitution
(added comment: Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union) adequate to the exigencies of
Government and the preservation of the Union.” (See Volume 32, pages 71-74).
It is VERY important to note the following: (1) Congress authorizes the Convention to suggest
alterations to the law form of the federal government by making changes to the Articles of
Confederation and perpetual Union, to which after being agreed to by Congress, would ONLY THEN be passed onto the states for their approval (2) Congress did NOT authorize the Convention to devise a
NEW form of government to replace the existing form of government.
May 25, 1787 with the delegates from nine states present, the Convention begins in the state house in
Philadelphia. A total of 73 delegates have been chosen by the states (excluding Rhode Island) although
only 55 attend. The delegates first vote to keep the proceedings absolutely secret.
June 19, 1787 rather than revise the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union, delegates at the
Convention vote to create an entirely new form of government. The delegates have violated federal law
based on the February 21, 1787 resolution with the task of this Convention “. . . for the sole and express
purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation (emphasis added). . .”
June 20, 1787 Oliver Ellsworth moves at the Federal Convention to call the government the "United
States" and NOT “The United States of America” as is the style of the Confederation as specified in
Article 1 of the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union. This is clearly seditious and treasonous
actions of identity theft by these traitorous delegates at the Federal Convention.
September 20, 1787 Congress receives paperwork from the “secret” Federal Convention. Congress
agrees to pay for their expenses of the treasonous people involved because Congress was kept in the
dark regarding their activities.
Included in the paperwork, besides the aforementioned expense reimbursements, were a letter from
the delegates in the convention, a letter from George Washington, president of the Convention, and the
Constitution for the United States. (See Volume 33, pages 487-503).
Here are the exact words for the approval of the Convention proposal (Constitution for the United
States):
“Resolved, That the proceeding Constitution be laid before the United States in Congress assembled, that
is should afterwards be submitted to a Convention of Delegates, chosen in each State by the People
thereof, under the Recommendation of its Legislature, for their Assent and Ratification; and that each
Convention assenting to, and ratifying the Same, should give Notice thereof to the United States in
Congress assembled.”
This violates existing federal law (the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union) in terms of how
changes to the law form are to take place. Here, the Convention tells Congress to just look at (“be laid
before”) the Constitution for the United States and then pass it on to the states.
Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union addresses changes to the law form and
says “Every state shall abide by the determinations of the united states in congress assembled, on all
questions which by this confederation are submitted to them. And the Articles of this confederation shall
be inviolably observed by every state, and the union shall be perpetual; nor shall any alteration at any time hereafter be made in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a congress of the united
states, and be afterwards confirmed by the legislatures of every state.” (Emphasis added)
Notice the difference? With existing law, Congress FIRST has to agree to any proposed
changes/alterations and then send it to the States for their approval. The recommendation from the
Federal Convention bypasses Congress’s approval process, thus a violation of existing federal law.
By violating federal law, the resolution of February 21, agreeing to only have the Federal Convention for
the sole and express purpose of making alterations to the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union
(existing law) and NOT for a new type of government, and then the Federal Convention delegates
propose to break federal law again by NOT abiding by Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation and
perpetual Union by ignoring the approved process to change federal law.
The “new and proposed” law form (Constitution for the United States) requires 2/3 majority to make
changes or bring into execution the “new and proposed” law form, again violating existing law that
requires a unanimous vote to make changes.
Let’s look at the letter from Washington given to Congress. In the first paragraph is says “. . . a different
organization.” The 2nd paragraph says “. . . give up a share of liberty . . . rights to be surrendered . . .”
Clearly he is informing Congress that the proposed Constitution for the United States will not be
pleasant to those states that want to retain their sovereignty, and the people that populate them.
On September 27, 1787 Congress reads, for the first time, the proposals from the Federal Convention.
Please read this passage from the Journals of the Continental Congress for this date carefully. These are
the smoking guns of all smoking guns proving, once and for all, the unlawfulness, according to the law of
the time, of the Constitution for the United States. Simply put, it was not brought forth and put into
place according to the law of time, thereby making it 100% unlawful, meaningless, and irrelevant! (See
Volume 33, pages 540-542).
“On motion of Mr. [Edward] Carrington seconded by Mr. [William] Bingham the motion of Mr.
[Abraham] Clark was postponed to take into consideration the following motion viz “Congress proceeded
to the consideration of the Constitution for the United States by the late Convention held in the City of
Philadelphia and thereupon resolved That Congress do agree thereto and that it be recommended to the
legislatures of the several states to cause conventions to be held as speedily as may be to the end that
the same may be adopted ratified and confirmed.”
Yes, this is ACTUALLY stricken out in the Journals but still there to be able to be read. It clearly shows
treason, and thus stricken out as if it never occurred. One can only conclude it is still in the Journals to
provide remedy for those wishing to regain their freedom. What is treasonous about this? Simple, the fact the Congress took a vote to approve of the Constitution
for the United States, clearly breaking federal law as Congress can ONLY deal with existing Federal law,
the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union, and not discuss any other law form.
13) September 22, 1787 the inhabitants of the District of Kentucky vote and approve, with the Virginia
legislature’s consent, to turn the district into an independent state and apply for admission into the
Union of the thirteen states.
14) If you disagree with the comments about #12, then let us look at the next passage, a motion made
by Nathan Dane that CLEARLY defends Union States Assembly’s position that the Constitution is
unlawful and all that occurred under it is unlawful as a consequence.
September 27, 1787 - [Motion of Mr. Dane on new Constitution] (See Volume 33, pages 543-544).
"Whereas Congress sensible that there were defects in the present Confederation; and that several of the
States were desirous that a Convention of Delegates should be formed to consider the same, and to
propose necessary alterations in the federal Constitution; in February last resolved that is was in their
opinion expedient that a Convention of the States should be held for the sole and express purpose of
revising the Articles of Confederation, and reporting to Congress and the several legislatures, such
alterations and provisions therein, as should when agreed to in Congress, and be confirmed by the
States, render the federal Constitution adequate to the exigencies of Government, and the preservation
of the Union.
And whereas it appears by Credentials laid before Congress, that twelve States (emphasis added)
appointed Delegates who assembled in Convention accordingly, and who did on the 17th instant, by the
unanimous consent of the States then present in convention agree upon, and afterwards lay before
Congress, a Constitution for the United States, to be submitted with the to a convention of Delegates,
chosen in each State by the people thereof, under the recommendation of its legislature, for their Assent
and ratification which constitution appears to be intended as an entire system in itself, and not as any
part of, or alteration in the Articles of Confederation; to alterations in which Articles, the deliberations
and powers of Congress are, in this Case, constitutionally (comment added: Articles of Confederation
and perpetual Union) confined, and whereas Congress cannot with propriety proceed to examine and
alter the said Constitution proposed, unless it be with a view so essentially to change the principles
and forms of it, as to make it an additional part in the said Confederation and the members of
Congress not feeling themselves authorised by the forms of Government under which they are
assembled, to express an opinion respecting a System of Government no way connected with those
forms(emphasis added and comment added: those forms is what Nathan Dane was referring as the
Constitution for the United States); but conceiving that the respect they owe their constituents and the
importance of the subject require, that the report of the Convention should, with all convenient dispatch,
be transmitted to the several States to be laid before the respectful legislatures thereof therefore Resolved that there be transmitted to the supreme executive of each State a copy of the report of the
Convention of the States lately Assembled in the City of Philadelphia signed by their deputies the
seventeenth instant including their resolutions, and their letter directed to the President of Congress."
Notice everything in red, underlined, and in bold text.
Congress agrees that the Constitution for the United States is a system in itself and not part of any
alteration or change to existing law, the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union. Thus, Congress
can make no suggestions for changes to the Constitution for the United States, as they can ONLY
comment on existing law, as that is their power delegated to them.
15) February 29, 1788 the delegates of Virginia formally motion to Congress “Resolved that the United
States in Congress Assembled do approve of the Compact solemnly entered into between the State of
Virginia and the District of Kentucky for the erection of the said District into a separate and Independent
Member of the federal Union”. (See Volume 34, pages 72-73).
16) March 24, 1788 in Rhode Island, the Constitution for the United States is rejected by a popular
referendum. The state, fearful of consolidated federal power, had refused to send a delegation to the
federal convention in Philadelphia and had subsequently rejected a state convention to consider
ratification.
17) June 2, 1788 Congress agrees “That in their opinion it is expedient that the district of Kentucky be
erected into an independent state and therefore they submit the following resolution, That the address
and resolutions from the district of Kentucky with the act of the legislature of Virginia therein specified
be referred to a committee consisting of a member from each state, to prepare and report an act for
acceding to the independence of the said district of Kentucky and for receiving the same into the Union
as a member thereof, in a mode conformable to the Articles of Confederation.” (See Volume 34, page
194).
Again, another instance where Congress is using the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union to
bring a new entry in the Union without needing any other documents, either the Northwest Ordinance
or the Constitution for the United States. This is, at least, the fourth time Congress has used existing law
to make provisions to bring a new entry into the Union. Cleary, the Articles of Confederation and
perpetual Union has the provisions necessary for the lawful entry into the Union of a new entry.
18) July 2, 1788 New Hampshire becomes the ninth state to ratify the Constitution for the United
States. A motion in Congress is approved “Ordered That the ratifications of the constitution of the
United States transmitted to Congress be referred to a committee to examine the same and report an
Act to Congress for putting the said constitution into operation in pursuance of the resolutions of the late
federal Convention.” (See Volume 34, pages 281-282).
At this point, nine state legislatures have committed treason against the confederation known as “The
United States of America” by unlawfully usurping the lawfully created government and Congress is complicit in that treason by putting time and effort into making their delegates determine a course for
putting into effect the new Constitution.
19) July 3, 1788 has a smoking gun for all smoking guns to prove, once and for all, EVERYTHING that
Union States Assembly stands for, which is the truth of history. This day’s entry proves the unlawfulness
of Constitution, that NO singular country, nation, or republic was ever created, and that the Articles of
Confederation has provisions to bring new entries in the Confederation known as “The United States of
America”. (See Volume 34, pages 287-294).
Here is the entry in Congress regarding this:
"A motion is made in Congress to erect the district of Kentucky into an independent state and join the
confederation of 13 states officially on January 1, 1789 (emphasis added). However, a motion is
approved to postpone that decision in the words following “Whereas application has been lately made to
Congress by the legislature of Virginia and the district of Kentucky for the admission of the said district
into the federal Union as a separate member thereof on the terms contained in the Acts of the said
legislature and in the resolutions of the said district relative to the premises.
And whereas Congress having fully considered the subject did on the third day of June last resolve that it
is expedient that the said district be erected into a sovereign and independent state and a separate
member of the federal Union and appointed a committee to report An Act accordingly which committee
on the second instant was discharged, it appearing that nine states had adopted the Constitution of the
United States lately submitted to conventions of the people; and whereas a new confederacy is formed
among the ratifying States (emphasis added) and it is highly probable that the state of Virginia including
the said district has already become a member of the said Confederacy. And whereas an Act of Congress
in the present state of government of the country severing a part of the said state from the other parts
thereof and admitting it into the Confederacy formed by the Articles of Confederation and perpetual
Union as an independent member thereof may be attended with dangerous consequences while it can
have no effect to make the said district a separate member of the federal Union formed by the
adoption of the said constitution (comment added: the Constitution for the United States) and
therefore it must be manifestly inexpedient for Congress assembled under the said articles of
Confederation to adopt any other measures relative to the premises than those which express their
sense that the said district ought to be an independent member of the Union as soon as circumstances
shall permit proper measures to be adopted for that purpose (emphasis added). Resolved that a copy
of the proceedings of Congress relative to Kentucky be transmitted to the legislature of Virginia and that
the said legislature be informed that as the constitution of the United States is now ratified Congress
think it unadviseable to adopt any further measures for admitting the district of Kentucky into the
federal Union (comment added: the original confederacy of 13 states) as in independent member
thereof under the articles of Confederation and perpetual Union (emphasis added), but that Congress
thinking it expedient that the said district as soon after proceedings shall commence under the said
constitution as circumstances shall permit recommend it to the said legislature and to the inhabitants of
the said district so to alter their Acts and resolutions relative to the premises, as to render them conformable to the provisions made in the said constitution to the end that no impediment may be in the
way of speedy accomplishment of this important business.”
The above motion being amended to read as “Whereas application has been lately made to Congress by
the legislature of Virginia and the district of Kentucky for the admission of the said district into the
federal Union as a separate member thereof on the terms contained in the acts of the said legislature
and in the resolutions of the said district relative to the premises. And whereas Congress having fully
considered the subject did on third day of June last (comment added: June 3, 1788) resolve that it is
expedient that the said district be erected into a sovereign and independent state and a separate
member of the federal Union (comment added: the original confederacy of 13 states) and appointed a
committee to report an Act accordingly, which committee on the second instant (comment added: July
2, 1788, the previous day) was discharged, it appearing that nine states had adopted the constitution
of the United States lately submitted to Conventions of the people. And whereas a new Confederacy is
formed among the ratifying States (emphasis added) and there is reason to believe the State of Virginia
including the said district did on the 25 of June last become a member of the said Confederacy; And
Whereas An Act of Congress, in the present state of government of the country, severing a part of the
said state from the other parts thereof and admitting it into the confederacy formed by the articles of
Confederation and perpetual Union as an independent member thereof may be attended with many
inconveniences while it can have no effect to make the said district a separate member of the federal
Union formed by the adoption of the said constitution and therefore it must be manifestly improper for
Congress assembled under the said Articles of Confederation to adopt any other measures relative to the
premises than those which express their sense that the said district ought it be an independent member
of the Union as soon as circumstances shall permit proper measures to be adopted for that purpose.”
This is the most telling of all passages in the Congressional Journals regarding the sedition and treason
that has resulted because of the lawful process not being followed in presenting and passing the
Constitution for the United States. A new confederacy has been set up between nine states. Yet those
nine states did not leave the existing confederacy of thirteen states. Thus, all government employees,
civil or military, Congress, and the state legislatures commit treason with everything they do because
which form of government do they follow? The two forms are repugnant to one another and when one
does something following one form, they commit treason against the other form, and vice versa.
Congress clearly knows this but does not come out and express it in terms that all can follow.
August 15, 1788 in In letter from the Secretary for foreign affairs, two things are disclosed “On the letter
of 2 June last from Mess N and J Staphorst, which was transmitted to Congress the 12 inst by the Sec. for
foreign affairs and in which Messrs Van Staphorst earnestly desire to be furnished with a compleat sett
of the Journals of Congress as a mean of providing in the best manner the monies necessary to support
the credit of the United States until the new government (emphasis added) can be organized and
operate to this effect; And to lay the foundation for transferring to the money lenders in Holland the debt
due by the US to the crown of France.” (See Volume 34, page 430). Most people, again, are not aware of either point in this passage from the Journals of the Continental
Congress. The first making a reference to the “new government” (to be known as the “United States”,
as referenced by the June 20, 1787 resolution in the federal convention, which has unlawfully usurped
the old but lawful government of the confederation known as “The United States of America” and stolen
the identity thereof) and the 2nd point, that France has sold the debt America owes her to private money
lenders in the Netherlands.
Keep in mind that the base word of constitution is constitute and an offshoot of that is constitutor. A
constitutor is one who is responsible for paying another’s debt, either voluntarily or involuntarily.
Hence, what has happened is that an unlawful process allowed for the usurpation of the lawful
government, and that lawful government was created by sovereign states and people. That lawful
government was subservient to the states, and thus the people within them. The “new government”
under the Constitution for the United States, usurped the lawful government through an unlawful
process, stole the identity of the lawful government, made the states subservient (and losing their
sovereignty) to the “new government” and thus the people within them being subservient (or subject to
and losing their sovereignty) to the “new government, and made the people, as whole, be responsible
for paying the debts created by all the states. Prior to the usurpation, the people within each state were
responsible for their own state’s debt and not another state’s debt. This is the fraud that has been
perpetrated upon the American people by not fully disclosing what had happened by the traitors who
committed these crimes against humanity.
Also, like under the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union, no singular nation was created under
the Constitution for the United States either.
20) Considering all the aforementioned, one must conclude that the Articles of Confederation and
perpetual Union is the only lawful law form that can be used to reclaim and continue a lawful
government.
SUMMARY OF UNION STATES ASSEMBLY
1) The Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union has provisions built into it and through
Congressional legislation for new entries to join the Union.
2) The process through which the Constitution for the Union States was created, brought forth, and put
in place were 100% unlawful according to the law of the time. As such, NOTHING related to the
Constitution for the United States is meaningful or relevant with respect to law of the people (or the
States they populate). May 4, 2016 Created by the Union States Assembly Historian


http://unionstatesassembly.info/index.html

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat May 14th, 2016 10:50 am
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6408
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)




*459 In the midst of this confused, gloomy, and seriously exigent condition of affairs, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 met at Philadelphia. The defects of the Articles of Confederation were so great as to be beyond all hope of amendment, and the Convention, acting in technical excess of its authority, proceeded to frame for submission to the people of the several states an entirely new Constitution. Shortly prior to the meeting of the Convention, Madison had assailed a bill pending in the Virginia Assembly, proposing the payment of private debts in three annual instalments, on the ground that "no legislative principle could vindicate such an interposition *460 of the law in private contracts." The bill was lost by a single vote.[4] Pelatiah Webster had likewise assailed similar laws as altering the value of contracts; and William Paterson, of New Jersey, had insisted that "the legislature should leave the parties to the law under which they contracted.

In the plan of government especially urged by Sherman and Ellsworth there was an article proposing that the legislatures of the individual states ought not to possess a right to emit bills of credit, etc., "or in any manner to obstruct or impede the recovery of debts, whereby the *461 interests of foreigners or the citizens of any other state may be affected."[6] And on July 13, 1787, Congress in New York, acutely conscious of the evils engendered by state laws interfering with existing contracts,[7] passed the Northwest Territory Ordinance, which contained the clause: "And, in the just preservation of rights and property, it is understood and declared, that no law ought ever to be made or have force in the said territory, that shall, in any manner whatever, interfere with or affect private contracts, or engagements, bona fide, and without fraud previously formed."[8] It is not surprising, therefore, that, after the Convention had adopted the clauses, no state shall "emit bills of credit," or "make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts," Mr. King moved to add a "prohibition on the states to interfere in private contracts." This was opposed by Gouverneur Morris and Colonel Mason. Colonel Mason thought that this would be carrying the restraint too far; that cases would happen that could not be foreseen where some kind of interference would be essential. This was on August 28. But Mason's view did not prevail, for, on September 14 following, the first clause of Art. I. § 10, was altered so as to include the provision. "No state shall . . . pass any . . . law impairing the obligation of contracts," and in that form it was adopted.[9].



There is a lot of deception in those words. The public debt was easily paid off by the sale of unoccupied lands that were considered pubic lands. Public in that case means for all, for everyone, like air, sun, water, food, shelter, land, is for everyone.



The deception required in order to twist the public things (res-publica) into "special interests" (private things) the deceivers have to confuse those two words. That makes very good reasonable sense, using logic, but it is very hard to see because of the confusion built into our lives from birth.



If it is the public debt (our country debt, our national debt, our state debt, our voluntary, mutual defense, debt, we as people owe, because we volunteer to be on the land, in the boarders, of our state) it is everyone's debt, and where common law was the law of the land, debt is paid in jury duty, and debt is paid in military duty if attacked, and in the American federation of states debt (for those people in those states) was paid in the sale of land. Debt was paid when people buy (invest) in the voluntary, mutual defense, association in your nation state, or country, which was a state, which was a former (slave plantation) colony.



Here:

"To the officers and soldiers in the service of the king of Great Britain, not subjects of the said king :
The citizens of the United States of America are engaged in a just and necessary war—a war in which they are not the only persons interested.

They contend for the rights of human nature, and therefore merit the patronage and assistance of all mankind.

Their , success will secure a refuge from persecution and tyranny to those who wish to pursue the dictates of their own consciences, and to reap the fruits of their own
industry. That kind Providence, who from seeming evil often produces real good, in permitting us to be involved in
this cruel war, and you to be compelled to aid our enemies in their vain attempts to enslave us, doubtless hath in view to establish perfect freedom in the new world,

for those who are borne down by the oppression and tyranny of the old.
Considering, therefore, that you are reluctantly compelled to be instruments of avarice and ambition, we not only forgive the injuries which you have been constrained to offer us,

but we hold out to your acceptance a participation of the privileges of free and independent states. Large and fertile tracts of country invite and will amply reward your industry."



That is in the secret documents for the original federal congress now available on the Union States Assembly web page. In those words, like the words describing the meaning of federation following, are the words that ring true with Matthew 7:12.



"That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:

"That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:

"That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us— a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:"



It was entirely possible at the time to move from the old bonds that bind criminal masters and their enslaved victims. Among the founders were infiltrators whose bond with each other was, is, and always will be the bond of willful choice to employ deception, threat of aggressive violence, and aggressive violence upon innocent victims, and in this case the deception is confusing public debt (voluntary mutual defense) with private debt (voluntary contracts), and where rule of law is strictly voluntary the opposite rule by criminal means is strictly involuntary as those who enforce involuntary association on other people, are the criminals, whereby they would never allow the same involuntary association enforced upon themselves, which is repugnant to the law explained so well in Matthew 7:12. The criminals confess their evil intent to enslave their targeted victims the moment they move from voluntary association (public debt) into (false) government private debt collection agency. That is the deceptive employment of the true bond that binds all people to all people voluntarily, which is the res-public, or government of the people, by the people, and for the people, truly for all, but deceptively employed instead of true law for all, and employed by the criminals as a special interest, a private corporate debt collection agency, whereby those who steal power have the power to then enforce their money monopoly scheme, and make their one money scarce for their victims, plentiful for their exclusive, elite, group, and make their victims powerless, where their victims are then paying any price to "borrow" the private money monopoly power to purchase, which is (criminal) interest on monopoly money, which is not private contract interest voluntarily agreed upon by free, independent, traders making a private lending deal. The criminals use the public thing to pay the cost of enforcing their criminal money lending scheme, which is a "subsidy" paid by all (public funds) where the private money lenders (monopolists) offset their own costs they create when they impoverish their victims to a point where their victims cannot physically survive AND pay the interest in the private debt scam. So...a free market would not tolerate such things as liar loans, stated income loans, and money monopolies, because the costs created by the criminal lenders would eventually require the criminals to spend all their profits on making sure that their victims never gain enough power to defend themselves. So...the money lender criminals must confuse the victims into a false sense of security in paying for their own demise, by digging their own graves, by giving all their voluntary defensive power to the criminals who impoverish the victims, under the color of law, as the victims are led to believe that they are paying for their own sanctuary, their own defense, when in reality they are handing their defensive power to the very criminals who impoverish them, and create their state of defenseless debt slavery. This is all covered in the Bible well enough here:




Proverbs 1:8 - 19
"8 Hear, my son, your father's instruction And do not forsake your mother's teaching ; 9 Indeed, they are a graceful wreath to your head And ornaments about your neck. 10 My son, if sinners entice you, Do not consent. 11 If they say, "Come with us, Let us lie in wait for blood, Let us ambush the innocent without cause ; 12 Let us swallow them alive like Sheol, Even whole, as those who go down to the pit ; 13 We will find all kinds of precious wealth, We will fill our houses with spoil ; 14 Throw in your lot with us, We shall all have one purse," 15 My son, do not walk in the way with them. Keep your feet from their path, 16 For their feet run to evil And they hasten to shed blood. 17 Indeed, it is useless to spread the baited net In the sight of any bird ; 18 But they lie in wait for their own blood ; They ambush their own lives. 19 So are the ways of everyone who gains by violence ; It takes away the life of its possessors."



Lies that impoverish all, because some chose evil:



FALSE:

"The defects of the Articles of Confederation were so great as to be beyond all hope of amendment..."



That is false. The slave traders in the north and south included African Slave Traders, Irish Slave Traders, and false Government Banking Monopoly Debt Slave Traders. These infiltrators were making a living (an evil existence, or counterfeit living as we understand the phrase "make a living," or earn a living, or be good stewards of what is given to us such as land, water, life, posterity, etc.) at pretending to be the government (public thing) while subsidizing their organized crime rings. So long as the African Slave Traders, the Irish Slave Traders, and the Debt Slave Traders could make a deal with each other, divide up the spoils, so long could those Slave Trader infiltrators command their creation which is a false version of the public thing, which is no longer for all the people all the time, which is instead for their exclusive Slave Trading Cabal, at the expense of everyone, including themselves, because they could have actually been good stewards instead of choosing to be criminals.


The public debts could have easily been paid off with sales to private people, who constitute new additions to the army of independent people volunteering to do what they can to defend their property within each independent state, as there were (and still are) large, unoccupied, tracts of land. The tracks of land were no longer occupied by anyone, including Indians, because the Indian population had been wiped out by diseases before the Europeans began settling America. Many of the good settlers formed voluntary mutual defense associations with the Indians, and much of the good, moral, voluntary, remaining, surviving, Indian population helped in creating the Revolutionary ideas, to adapt the American independent, mutual defense association, and federation, into what it was before the criminal slave traders usurped it in 1787/89.



If private contracts between people in Britain (the enemy whose crimes include rape, torture, mass murder, and worse) are to be enforced through due process of law in America, at the time, then all that is covered, each case, with common law due process. The criminals had to reestablish their criminal extortion racket enforcement arm, which was loosely named exchequer, admiralty, maritime, equity, nisi prius, summary, "court," which is a counterfeit version of a common law court, or court of record, or court of conscious, where trial by the country (the people) proceeded according to the common law.



If these people wanting to "improve" the Articles of Confederation wanted to pay off National Debt, then they had to first create a Criminal Nation State, to then trade with the enemy, give the enemy power, power taken from the people in the Criminal Nation State. That was the story in Massachusetts during the events that became known as Shays's Rebellion. Massachusetts was taken over by infiltrators sharing RULE BY CRIMINAL MEANS with the British. The people in Massachusetts continued the Revolutionary War in that independent State where the criminals had reestablished their RULE BY CRIMINAL MEANS.



That is covered very well in a book, and the following lecture:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QSwmvMr9cY

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 12:29 am  
Power Independence > Study Group > Study Group > Identity Theft Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems