|Moderated by: Joe Kelley||
|Political Economy|| Rate Topic
|Posted: Tue Feb 16th, 2016 04:27 pm||
|Returning to the Secret Documents linked to the Union States Assembly Web Page the following quotes bear careful study; so as not to repeat the mistakes made by those who fail, time and again, to recognize, accurately account for, and defend against those who Rule by Criminal Means, which is a routine, easily recognizable, pattern of behavior.
MARCH 29, 1779.
Here is the link form Union States Assembly:
Cutting and pasting from that file is not perfect, and it ought to be known that anything can be counterfeited, but within those words are the principles that must be understood.
As already stated, there was great value in fertile land, so much land as to be sufficient land to allow Indian populations, African Populations, Irish Populations, English Populations, German Populations, French Populations, Dutch Populations, Spanish Populations, Portuguese Populations, Chinese Populations, Japanese Populations, Russian Populations, Polish Populations, Jewish Populations, Arabian Populations, Persian Populations, Catholic Populations, Christian Populations, Muslim Populations, Buddhist Populations, to flourish peacefully in their combined ability to muster their mutual defense against all enemies of Liberty, foreign, and domestic. If they volunteer to cooperate toward that defensive power effectively, without having infiltrators turn the voluntary defense association into an involuntary (slavery) offensive organized crime spree, or protracted pogrom, then they, the voluntary defenders, actually defend each other voluntarily, and crime no longer pays, in that land, defended by those voluntary defenders.
It is not about race, religion, or any other diversity concerning voluntary associations among people sharing similar characteristics. It is clearly a division between those who know and understand a criminal when a criminal is active in perpetrating crimes upon innocent people, and a defender is defending the innocent people from harm done to the innocent people by the guilty criminals.
Friend or Foe?
The criminals cause the first division, dividing from the whole number of volunteer defenders, a victim, and then the criminal consumes that victim, which causes the division, which causes two sides to be two sides, which causes the demand for, the necessity of, defense against the criminal who invented, and then acted out, that crime, which is the first division from the whole of Liberty.
The grey area concerns the criminals who need to know which criminals are on their side and how those criminals can infiltrate, and divide, and conquer, the defenders side.
On the criminal side the glue binding them is the avarice for, the greed for, the desire for, victims, the criminals side is glued by a trust in each criminal trusting that each criminal will agree to cooperate so long as there are enough victims to be fed to those criminals in that criminal organization, on that side, which is the side created by the criminals out of the whole of peaceful Liberty.
On the defenders side is a trust in the absolute necessity of defending the weakest among us, for if that fails, then the criminal numbers will grow, as there will be more, and more, food (victims) feeding the criminal side, as that food then empowers the criminal side with more power to entice, lure, and feed more criminals, with more victims. The weakest are consumed when there is no defense whatsoever, and like taking candy from a baby, the criminals among us are inspired to take that employment as their way through life, taking candy from babies, which, if you understand history, includes criminals who actually eat babies. So there is a trust gluing the defender side that understands the absolute necessity to defend the weakest among us, as if those weakest among us were the proverbial Canary in the Coal Mine, as the weakest among us show to the rest of us, our fate when, systematically, we are rendered the weakest among us, because the criminal side grows into a irresistible power.
Before cutting out the words needed to be cut out of the quote above, and then before explaining the situation from another angle of view, it is vital to point out current realities for people on the defensive side of things, whose names, places, thoughts, and actions may not be broadcast to the world, for all to know, and for all to understand, perpetually, because these people are often too busy working their own peaceful, but defensive, lives, and they therefore have no time to spread their version of their history to the world, certainly not compared to how well the criminals manage to brainwash their victims once the criminals take over governments, as the criminals write the history that the criminals want the victims to be subjected to, which is a false - at best a half true - version of his story.
People on small independent farms can connect to people on small independent farms with an accurate accounting system, or medium of exchange, which is knowable as currency, or money, and once this ability to connect accurately is in place, and working, those independent famers share their prosperity, and in so doing there is a rapid capacity to increase prosperity for reasons that ought to be understood.
Consider an analogy offered now. The individual may want to nurture their own capacity to accurately discriminate between fact and faction, which is also a nurturing of their own capacity to accurately discriminate the difference between friend and foe. How does the individual know the fact that they are effectively nurturing their ability to accurately discriminate the difference between fact and fiction? If there is an increase in ability to know better, then there is an increase in ability to know even better, then even better, because there is an increase in the ability to know when the individual fail to know better. Shedding the false, adopting the true, reduces the false, and increases the true, over time. The rate of increase can be exponential. The rate of increase in the opposite direction, holding onto the false, and shedding the true, can also be an exponential rate of increase.
Which is better?
An exponential increase in awareness of the accurate acknowledgment of reality as it exists?
An exponential increase in awareness of the inaccurate acknowledgement of falsehood as it exists?
If an individual seeks, and finds, and employs accurate perception of reality, then they, are, by that industry, the master of their actions to the extent that it is possible for an individual to be in charge of their own lives.
If an individual fails to seek, find, and employ accurate perception of reality, then the false reality they are subject to is the source of their path through life, as falsehood leads them, and by extension those who create that false version of reality lead, or are masters of, those powerless people who fail to seek, find, and employ accurate perception of reality.
That is a long, drawn out, intended analogy for the concept of political economy on a scale involving more than one individual.
When people effectively defend the weakest among people, which is when crime no longer pays, which is when crime is at a minimum in a network of people connected for their mutual defense, voluntarily, the ability to produce prosperity increases rapidly, or exponentially, as a result of 3 measureable consequences of that voluntary, productive, cooperation.
2. Division of Labor
3. Economies of Scale
Specialization is an ability for one individual farmer to make corn best, so that individual farmer finds corn as his, or her, that families, best occupation, they make corn best. Then another family makes rice best, another is producing the best horses, another the best pigs, another the best cows. Then there are the mechanics, so called, and some make the best plows. Some make the best houses. Some make barns better. Each individual specializes because each individual, in Liberty, is unfettered (no longer powerless) to find what they, as independent, individuals, do best, other than, of course, best at crime. Remember, this is the side where the weakest among us is effectively defended against those who are best at crime, so this is not specialization on the side where the criminals effectively organize.
Division of Labor involves the connection between the best of the best doing what they do best, so they don't waste time doing what they cannot do best, while other individual, independent, producers, do what they do best, and the labor is thereby divided in such a way as to improve the total output, as the best do what they do best, and no one is wasting their time and energy doing what they do worst.
Economies of scale can be understood from a farmers point of view, or from a mechanics point of view, whereby a farmer or mechanic may spend an entire year of work on producing one thing if the economy of scale is very small. If the economy of scale is very large, then the farmer, or the mechanic, can produce many things, because there are many places for these many things to go. A modern example may work well here too, but for a farmer the situation is relevant to the subject of "When the Criminals took over America," as are the mechanics, in this present study of the Secret Documents.
Economies of scale, when the reach of the single economy is large, affords the farmer the opportunity to make many items for many people who need that item, and thereby the costs of producing that item are divided among all those individual, independent, fellow producers, who are also fellow consumers. You trade, or buy with money, one thing for one thing, and if you are trading a truck load of corn, for something of equal value, then all your costs for that year of producing corn is paid for with that one sale, if that is the only sale that year. If, on the other hand, 10 truck loads are compared to only 1 truck load, then the cost of doing business that year is divided 10 times, which means, the price of one truck load is reduced by a factor of 10.
That may be difficult to see, unless you look at the extremes. If there was only 1 corn stalk produced by the farmer all year, because there was only one individual who wanted that one individual corn stalk, then all the costs of that one individual farmer would be offset, or paid for, by that one corn stalk. Which means, that all the costs of watering the corn stalk, all the costs of feeding the farmers family, all the costs, every cost, would have to be offset by that one stalk of corn, and what then would be the minimum price for that one stalk of corn, in order for that corn farmer to stay in business when the economy of scale is small? The other extreme is a farmer who cannot, ever, produce enough stalks of corn to supply all the corn demanded by all the people wanting corn in a very large economy of scale, and in that way you see the two extremes of economies of scale.
Now back to the average Joe producer in the South when America was under attack by a Criminal Army of British Troops, who are demanding obedience to a Tyrant Criminal. You, goes the routine order, must obey, and you must do so without question. Failing to agree to blind obedience results in punishment. Punishment can range from one extreme to another. Punishment can go from no punishment to torture and murder on prison ships, depending upon whatever the Military criminal issuing the order decides on the spot.
Criminal Rules are also called Summary Justice; a false version of justice.
Farmers, and mechanics, at that time faced that choice between Rule of Law and Rule by Criminal Means, well before the British ever showed up on the scene to enforce the British version of Slavery. What are their names? Where did they live? What were their stories? Who wrote the history you read?
If the South was run by Aristocratic Slave Trading Farmers, then the South was already taken over (the government was taken over) by Criminal Means.
There are a few things that have to happen in order for those Criminal Slave Traders to take over the south. They must have access to specialization, division of labor, and economies of scale too. If the non-criminal, non-slave trading farmers where not in the South providing a number of individual, independent, consumers in need of the products of the Slave Trading Criminals, then those Slave Trading Criminals had to have access to other consumers in other places, or they would not have the power to take over the South. There must be trade, which is not criminal trade, meaning that there must be producers who exchange with other producers, in order for economic power to grow past that power of one, single, independent, producers ability to produce.
Look at it this way, if you invented a device that was powered sufficiently by the sun, oxygen, and you add water, and you add dirt from around your yard, and you can make anything you ever wanted with this device, you just turn it on, feed it water, oxygen, and dirt, then you would never need Specialization, Division of Labor, or Economies of Scale, once you were set up that way, on your plot of land, where you have access to that land, that oxygen, and that water, with your device that is powered by the sun.
You get anything you ever wanted. You type in what you want, you hit the enter button, you open the door, and there is what you want, including more of these devices.
You can make an atomic bomb too.
You can make a virus that destroys all life on earth too.
You can make a shelter against atomic bombs?
You can make an anti virus that nullifies the virus that destroys all life on earth?
Absent that power, those few individual, independent, Criminal Slave Traders, who took over the South, had to get connected to other people, who were not Slave Traders, so as to stay in business. The Criminals Means by which that connection is always made, is counterfeit Rule of Law, counterfeit Money, and counterfeit Mutual Defense.
Mutual defense (voluntary)
1. Defend everyone from harm (real)
2. Defend the criminals having access to their victims (counterfeit
The criminals start taking over the South, and they make slaves out of the Indians who refuse to obey without question. The criminals then start importing African Slaves (same thing in the North but Irish Slaves are predominating among the criminals)and what does that do to Liberty, and independent, individual, non-criminal, farmers and mechanics?
If you want to work on a non-criminal farm, what type of wage can be paid to you by an independent, non-criminal, farmer? While the criminals are pumping out products using Slave Labor, in your county, in your Colony, which became your State, you have a choice to hire an employee, or do all the work yourself, because you are not a criminal Slave Trader. Why would an independent, individual, be looking for a job instead of looking for their own piece of land to defend themselves, or help other independent farmers in defense of their farms too, when land is abundant, and land is fertile, and Liberty is our common cause?
Exactly how many non-criminal, independent, farmers, and mechanics were in the South at the time Congress recorded these words, and what power did they have (other than common law) to effect their so called Government in the South?
Which words? I've been babbling incoherently for ages?
|Posted: Tue Feb 16th, 2016 06:09 pm||
|"That the state of South Carolina, as represented by the delegates to the said state, and by Mr. Huger, who has come hither at the request of the governour of the said state, on purpose to explain the particular circumstances thereof, is unable to make any efteclual efforts with militia, by reason of the great proportion of citizens necessary to remain at home, to prevent insurrections among the negroes, and to prevent the desertion of them to the enemy. That the slate of the country, and the great numbers of those people among them, expose the inhabitants to great danger from the endeavours of the enemy to excite them either to revolt or desert."
Keep in mind that the word Militia is used to describe a specific group of people led by a specific individual in command of said Militia. Is the commander of said Militia a Slave Trader, and are the individual commanded by the said Militia also Slave Traders themselves?
How many slaves were owned by how many people in the South?
Again, are the numbers fabricated, counterfeit, or is the useful information accurate, true, and not misleading?
I want to return to this soon...
Georgia banned both slavery and Africans from the state; large numbers of “free blacks” owned black slaves; and less than 5 percent of pre-Civil War American families actually had slaves.
One can say that black slaveholders were the exception, but so, too, were white ones. According to McGrath (2001, p. 1) "only a small minority of Southern whites owned slaves, little more than five percent of the white population if calculated by individual owner, or some 20 to 25 percent if all members of the slave owners' families are included." This means that 75 percent or more of white Southerners neither owned slaves themselves nor were they members of slave owning families. This is not to imply that black slave owners were equal to their white counterparts in terms of power and control of the system. What seems clear is that black slave owners came to identify with their white counterparts in terms of ownership of slaves to such an extent that they had a vested interest in the system.
I may return to the task if finding (re-finding a link I failed to save in a place I can find it now) a more comprehensive study done on African Slave Demographics of Ownership. The idea is to understand the total damage done by the criminals who take over governments (those who enslave) and all who are victim (including the criminals themselves) to this type of crime "against nature itself."
I did find something relevant at Wikipedia, perhaps worth of inserting here:
It must be understood that the term common law has (as with Rule of Law) two opposing meanings:
1. Genuine, accurate, and true.
2. Counterfeit, inaccurate, and deceptive
Those who are criminals (Slave Traders) consider the common law on their side when those criminals explain what common law means.
Those who are not criminals may be those who offer the following:
For most of the early common law history, the courts were not called upon to consider the position in relation to slavery. However, the law did, from at least the time of the Magna Carta of 1215 recognise that all persons had a basic right to liberty, and it was recognised before that date that persons had a basic right not to be the subject of assaults by others.
That is foreign to moral understanding, which is the basis of rule of law, or due process, or the law of the land, or the common law. Liberty is what it is, and it is for all, not just for those who are powerful enough to deceive people into thinking otherwise.
|Posted: Wed Feb 17th, 2016 04:21 pm||
|New day, lost my place, but I know that the information was leading to a crucial point. I have to go to work today, so I'll have less time to move another step in this study.
That by requesting Congress that a military arrest should be the only restraint on the person of colonel Flower, they were guilty of a disobedience to the authority of Congress.
Again, to get back to the point, or a vital point, the Congress ordered the end of the slave trade early in the process. A huge victory for Liberty would have been to identify the criminals in the North and South, and account for them, as they were criminals perpetrating "crimes against nature itself, and everyone (even the criminals themselves) injured by this type of crime would have been benefitted by that just, moral, true, accurate, effective, employment of Rule of Law.
Some may say that the need for Military Expediency was the reason why Congress could not deal with the criminals among themselves, at that time.
That is why this point in the study proves that such an argument is not only baseless, it is contrary to the facts as the facts are reasoned out thoughtfully.
If so many people, from so many races, religions, were running away from tyranny, such as British Tyranny, Dutch Tyranny, and the like, then their common bond was to find, employ, and defend a land where people running away from Tyranny could find, earn, and keep sanctuary, or liberty, from Tyranny - and these people knowable as we the moral, voluntary, defensive, federated, people - all of them, could defend all of them, no matter what their former owners claimed to be their reasons for owning people. That common bond, bonding all free minded, and free acting, people, to defend each other, constitutes the moral justification for all police, or military, use of force anywhere, anytime, against those whose common bond is to excuse, apologize for, fund, aid, abet, lend moral support to, and lend material support to, Tyranny in every single flavor and form.
If it was right, justified, good, productive, and Militarily sound to offer German Mercenaries, or Indians, or British Officers, or French, or Polish, or Spanish people, a stake of land for their prosperous, productive, employment, and their defense against Tyranny, which then increases the numbers of defenders against Tyranny, while at the same time reducing the numbers of people working for the Tyrants (taking an oath of blind obedience to the so called "King"), then why is that somehow not a sound Military, efficient, decision when dealing with African (or Irish) Slaves?
When I get back you will see in the Secret Record, published by Union States Assembly, that people were on the right side of this African Slave Military Matter too.
I will return to cutting and pasting the relevant quotes, and then we can find out later one, with further study, what happened to the proposal to do the right thing, in this matter too.
That the state of South Carolina, as represented by the delegates to the said state, and by Mr. Huger, who has come hither at the request of the governour of the said state, on purpose to explain the particular circumstances thereof, is unable to make any effectual efforts with militia, by reason of the great proportion of citizens necessary to remain at home,
The word "detaching" may need to be understood in context?
Background check on Mr. Huger uncovers:
Address to the non-slaveholders of the South, on the social and political evils of slavery
Before reading that, what was the answer from Congress as to the proposal by Mr. Huger to offer slaves a choice to fight the British? The right thing to do would be to give everyone the same opportunity already offered the Germans back in these same Secret Documents on page 71:
To the officers and soldiers in the service of the king of Great Britain, not subjects of the said king: The citizens of the United States of America are engaged in a just and necessary war — a war in which they are not the only persons interested. They contend for the rights of human nature, and therefore merit the patronage and assistance of all mankind. Their , success will secure a refuge from persecution and tyranny to those who wish to pursue the dictates of their own consciences, and to reap the fruits of their own industry.
So going back to the Secret Documents from Congress to find what Congress decides to do with the proposal by Mr. Huger.
Page 109 of those Secret Documents of Congress:
Resolved, That it be recommended to the stales of
Resolved, That Congress will make provision for
|Posted: Tue Mar 8th, 2016 05:26 pm||
Above shows a process by which Military Soldiers are treated by those who defeat said soldiers in war.
Below is a secret record in Congress (Page 132)
Resolved, That for facilitating the settlement of the accounts of the United States against the troops of the convention of Saratoga, which have arisen subsequently to those settled and paid by lieutenant general Burgoyne, previous to his departure for England, all articles proper to be included be charged at the same rates as the like articles were charged in the accounts settled between major general Heath and lieutenant general
How, on the other hand, where the so called "rebels" treated?
“It had been the usual custom for each person to carry below, when he descended at sunset, a pint of water, to quench his thirst during the night. But, on this occasion, we had thus been driven to our dungeon three hours before the setting of the sun, and without our usual supply of water. Of this night I cannot describe the horror. The day had been sultry, and the heat was extreme throughout the ship. The unusual number of hours during which we had been crowded together between decks; the foul atmosphere and sickening heat; the additional excitement and restlessness caused by the unwonted wanton attack which had been made; above all, the want of water, not a drop of which could be obtained during the whole night, to cool our parched lips; the imprecations of those who were half distracted with their burning thirst; the shrieks and wails of the wounded; the struggles and groans of the dying; together formed a combination of horrors which no pen can describe”
We are still being lied to about our common history.
On one side is Rule of Law, which is also called natural law, and this process is strictly voluntary.
On the other side is tyranny, or despotism, or what I call criminal rule, and on that side those who are the worst criminals re those in command of all the lesser criminals, and in command of all the victims, or slaves, or targets, which are, ultimately, the source of power for all the criminals, as the criminals consume their targets, in order for the criminals to maintain criminal life = parasites.
All that would have been required then, and all that is required now, and all that need be required in the future, is for good, moral, people to effectilvey hold to an accurate account, the evil, immoral, people.
Deception is as powerful as truth?
|Posted: Mon Mar 14th, 2016 07:10 pm||
Slavery is maintained by you whom it impoverishes and degrades, not by those upon whom it confers wealth and influence. These assertions will be received by you and others with surprise and incredulity. Before you condemn them, ponder the following considerations and statistics.
The reasoning for this part of this study working on this subject matter has to do with the concept of political economy as political economy is replaced with a counterfeit version of political economy, whereby those who offer each other mutual defense against criminals running the show are made to believe the lie that the criminals can do a better job of protecting the victims than can the victims.
Is it in anyone's best interest to allow the criminals to take over the job of providing sanctuary for former slaves, so that former slaves have a place to go, in Liberty, to live and let live, and to prosper by their own productive industry, including the investments they may voluntarily make for their mutual defense?
|Current time is 12:30 am|
|Power Independence > Study Group > Study Group > Political Economy||Top|