|Moderated by: Joe Kelley||
|Report|| Rate Topic
|Posted: Sun Jul 6th, 2014 06:26 pm||
|The order of dominoes were setup by criminals for criminals reasons.
People need a few very intelligent money changers at the top of a financial pyramid scheme, for without these financial dictators offering their benevolent intelligence, no one can produce any credit worthy standing of any measure of any kind at all ever.
So...send your productive value (surplus wealth), the productive value you produce, into a FUND run by these criminals, and then these criminals will create the credit worthy standing of their fraudulent measures, as they buy things with the money you sent them, and they buy borrowers who then pay them even more surplus wealth in the form of National Interest.
So the first domino is a ponzi scheme based upon the lie that only these few money changers are able to create National Credit, and they print money on The Good Faith and Credit of the American People, while they claim that they are loaning money to people in America.
Now that is hard to believe, I know, as very few people can break down the lie they have planted in their brains on their own, and very few people can break down the lie they have planted in their brains with help, so that leaves very few people knowing right from wrong in this case of National Interest.
It is not that difficult to understand, as far as the workings of the lie, as the liars gain POWER from the believers who believe in the lie.
People who produce surplus wealth, are the people who earn good credit, and that includes anyone working at any productive employment of any kind, anywhere, those are the people who constitute The Good Faith and Credit of the American People, and it is those people who are loaning the POWER to print money to the lying criminals. Then the lying criminals claim that they are loaning money (that they borrowed) to the people who produce anything worth stealing.
You don't have to be a genius to figure this out, I know, because I am no genius, all I am is an old guy who stuck to my goal of figuring this out, and after decades of hard work the product, the fruits of my labor, is knowledge.
Here, next, are two offers of information from people who ought to know something worth knowing. I can link the source, and if the reader can separate the source of the information from the information long enough to employ the information on the face value of the information, then that zeroing in on the information alone, ought to help the reader decipher the lie, how the lie works, and therefore be in a position to work on an effective defense against the lie.
Here is an author of a book (linked) quoting from the first American, official, legal counterfeiter, a man maned Alexander Hamilton:
But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.
To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter.
That is the first American legal counterfeiter explaining the lie in lying words. What that criminal is actually saying is that We the Criminals will henceforth work diligently at convincing our victims of their need to send us their productive capacity so that We the Criminals can then loan that wealth back to our victims, and we will charge them interest on the principle.
So, that may be still hard to understand, but it isn't, all you have to know is that the principle (the loan) was stolen in the first place, so the interest (on the stolen principle), is simply an added rate of theft added to the original rate of theft.
The confession of the lie is right there in the quoted words of the liar. The same lie is told when liars say such things as "Read my lips, no new taxes." and that brings up the second lie lined up as dominoes.
Having established a legalized (fraud) counterfeiting system, which took many years to accomplish, from the First Bank of the United States, a Central Banking Fraud designed the same way all Central Banking Fraud Systems are designed, copied by the Communists by the way, then the Second Bank of the United States, and then the Federal Reserve System of Fraud, and then, up until just recently, The International Monetary FUND, and now there is a period of uncertainty as to where the criminals, and which criminals, will take over after World War III, most likely the World Reserve Currency Power will settle in Asia, after the criminals get done using up all the Cannon Fodder in Russia, Nato, and America.
So the second domino in this World Reserve Currency Crime stuff is Involuntary Taxation, and the reason for that domino being put in place has to do with the necessity of creating a demand for the fraudulent money. No one in their right mind would work all day to then be paid, for all that work all day, paid with used toilet paper, or paid with used condoms.
So the Involuntary Tax System of Extortion has to be the domino put in place to compliment the Central Banking Fraud System, and then all the workers are working to FIRST produce enough "money" to pay the Extortion fee, and then after working hard enough, long enough, to earn enough used sheets of toilet paper, and enough used condoms, collecting those used sheets of toilet paper, and those used condoms, to pay the bill handed to the productive people by the criminals running the Extortion racket, paying those "liabilities" off, first, paying that off first, then, after that bill is paid, then people work to create their own, real, credit worthy standing. Note: who pays liabilities, who has limited liabilities, who spends, buys, invests, those liabilities, and what do the spenders, buyers, investors, buy, exactly, precisely, if the idea is an accurate accounting?
They buy more fraud, more extortion, and much more aggressive, criminal, violence.
They buy world wars. You are invited to attend.
When it all gets going as planned no one, or very few people, question the fact that everyone is working harder, and harder, to make less, and less, and they use used toilet paper, and used condoms, as their preferred money.
It is worse, of course, than used toilet paper, and used condoms, but the trick is to fool the victims into thinking that everyone must be using this fake money, and that trick is that combination of creating the demand for the fake money, claiming that everyone has to pay "Taxes" (extortion fees) with ONLY that ONE MONOPOLY MONEY.
Who would ever demand to be paid in used condoms? Who would ever demand to be paid with used toilet paper? Who would ever demand to be paid with drug pusher, drug soaked, guilt soaked, paper money? Who would ever demand to be paid with innocent blood soaked money?
No one in their right mind would demand that money without some criminal creating that demand with a working extortion racket whereby you must pay, and you must pay ONLY with that money soaked in that innocent blood.
So here is the explanation that may hit home for some few, very few, people:
First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount. If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefor of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks. This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise. Labor will then be in a position to dictate its wages, and will thus secure its natural wage, its entire product. Thus the same blow that strikes interest down will send wages up. But this is not all. Down will go profits also. For merchants, instead of buying at high prices on credit, will borrow money of the banks at less than one per cent., buy at low prices for cash, and correspondingly reduce the prices of their goods to their customers. And with the rest will go house-rent. For no one who can borrow capital at one per cent. with which to build a house of his own will consent to pay rent to a landlord at a higher rate than that. Such is the vast claim made by Proudhon and Warren as to the results of the simple abolition of the money monopoly.
The money is much worse than trading with used toilet paper and used condoms. The papers being used constitute inculpatory evidence of crimes so horrible as to leave trace evidence of drugs and blood on the fraudulent money.
At least if it were used toilet paper and used condoms the people using the money would know precisely what they were trading as the stink and the texture would clue the traders in on their trade. Here have some more, and how many people would be washing their hands after a days trading?
When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
So there are the first two dominoes put in place by the criminals who take over our common defense, our government, our liberty, and so why is the third domino necessary?
Crime can be seen as three divisions.
1. Deception targeting the innocent victims or simple fraud, or confidence schemes
2. Threat of violence targeting the innocent victims or extortion (needed to create demand for number 1 above)
3. Actual, torturous, horrible, terrifying, brutal, savage, evil, aggressive violence (needed to make threats real in the minds of the innocent victims)
Three, the third domino, ends up infected the minds of everyone when things really get going, as One, and Two, above make everyone so weak of mind, weak of spirit, weak of moral conscience, that the only thing left is everyone at everyone's throat like rats on a sinking ship that everyone sunk on their own, criminal, hamster wheel.
So...where does the violence come from?
I no longer have a book, it was loaned out, and in this book are words that I will describe in my own words. I can link the book, but I did not write down for my own use, the words in the book. The story line is my own, and you can see if it fits on your own.
Actually my copy may be a different book, and so my story line may not have been inspired by the words in the book linked above.
The story line has to do with a few sentences written in an old book where the author was describing a routine done by people upon people.
People were doing well settling in places where people already existed. Settlers were on the Frontier around Tennessee, and the value of the land was seen by some as a means by which a few people could profit greatly at the expense of many people, so a plan was devised to create a demand for special services.
These inventive people seeking enormous profits hired special people who specialized in slaughtering babies, or whatever works to terrorize people the most, and so these specialized mass murderers were then painted up as Indians, and these mercenaries, these specialists who are very good at mass murder, very good at slaughter, very good at terror, were then set to the task of slaughtering Settlers, so as to blame the Indians, so as to create the demand for these same people who would then offer their services in defense of the Settlers against the Indians.
Simple enough no?
There is this Indian Problem. There is a solution. Dress up as Indians, slaughter Settlers.
Blame the Indians.
Now offer services to Settlers, for a fee, not for free, to slaughter Indians.
Who then owns the land? How much is it worth? Who buys into the scheme?
Who gained ownership of the land after the land was cleared of those savage Indians?
I'll give you a hint:
Central Banking Frauds
Tax Fraud or Extortion Collectors
Regular old people who fail to see what really happens when 1 and 2 above get going in a big way.
Who sold the land to who once the Indian Problem was solved in the usual Final Solution done by the usual types who usually use The Final Solution?
So...someone has to pony up to become those who do the slaughtering.
Why are there so many suicides recorded officially, or covered up officially, when people are trained to specialize in defense of Liberty, and instead of defense of Liberty those specialists are ordered to slaughter innocent people who happen to be existing on the land that the criminals want so desperately?
Case in point:
"Hugh Thompson, by now almost frantic, saw bodies in the ditch, including a few people who were still alive. He landed his helicopter and told Calley to hold his men there while he evacuated the civilians. (One account reports Thompson told his helicopter crew chief to "open up on the Americans" if they fired at the civilians, but Thompson later said he did not remember having done so.) He put himself between Calley's men and the Vietnamese. When a rescue helicopter landed, Thompson had the nine civilians, including five children, flown to the nearest army hospital. Later, Thompson was to land again and rescue a baby still clinging to her dead mother. "
I pick that quote for effect, but there is a sentence that says more, perhaps, with fewer words:
"Some refused, others obeyed."
So the concept with Case 3, added to Case 2, added to Case 1 is not that difficult to understand.
Those who refuse to obey criminals orders are on our side, so we the people can defend them.
If we do not, then the blood is on our hands too, and no amount of washing will reach the goal of innocence, in fact, the washing business is the problem, like fornicating our way back to virginity.
I hope that helps.
By the way, to all those whose comments amount to TL;DNR, these offers of mine are not gifts, they are road blocks, depending upon your point of view. If it looks like work, smells like work, then it probably is work.
|Current time is 12:34 am|
|Power Independence > Liberty Day Challenge 2015 > Updates > Report||Top|