 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
So any person who gave in to misunderstanding and become, say, thief - was exiled. Why not killed? Because they were relatives, they were pitied, even murderers and rapists. And they were even given supplies for the road.
Sergey has, to me, as much of a good soul as anyone, no more, and no less, valuable to me as anyone else, because of such things as the above quoted words.
I do not like the fact that Sergey and bear are unable to reconcile differences that may be reconcilable, if I am at all able to demonstrate the possibility that such reconciliation can occur.
Those who are not subject to the same thoughts as other people are not subject to them, and therefore it is potentially impossible to "get into their shoes," and in this thing called life, it seems to me, despite the difficulty, there is value in working to reach that potentially impossible goal.
In other words, there are enough barriers existing between one person and another person already, so why build more, if the idea is to learn from each other?
If the idea is to defeat each other, then the barriers being built are called check vales, or transistors, or one way connections, where attacks can flow from attacker to target, and the barriers are constructed in such a way as to remove the possibility of any return, through the barrier, of any power at all, going from target, and going back to attacker.
Dictation is a flow of power from the source to the target, and the dictator has no capacity, whatsoever, of knowing anything that the target may have to offer back to the dictator; by choice.
One way, on purpose.
For fun, or for profit?
And all those parasites ended up going west, many of which forming bandit gangs and returning. Others, discovering less technologically advanced peoples effectively became leaders. Yet they were parasites which resulted in many states with parasitic foundation. And my ancestors paid dearly for not executing parasites early on.
If possible, and forget it if it is not possible, the principles, and the expedient practicalities of employing principles, can be documented in English.
I cannot read Russian, and I am old, running out of time, for reaching such goals as reading Russian.
In English:
I.
Criminals commit crime.
True or false?
If true then is there a way to avoid being victim or criminal?
If true, then by whose power is it determined to be neither criminal or victim?
To me, as far as my limited power goes, no one is harmed willfully by any other person, when there is neither criminal or victim.
To me, therefore, the following is reasonable:
So any person who gave in to misunderstanding and become, say, thief - was exiled. Why not killed? Because they were relatives, they were pitied, even murderers and rapists. And they were even given supplies for the road.
I have trouble reasoning out the following:
And all those parasites ended up going west, many of which forming bandit gangs and returning. Others, discovering less technologically advanced peoples effectively became leaders. Yet they were parasites which resulted in many states with parasitic foundation. And my ancestors paid dearly for not executing parasites early on.
Specifically this:
And my ancestors paid dearly for not executing parasites early on.
Any case in point, as an accurately measurable, perceivable, communicable, realizable, understandable, actual, situation involving an individual "ancestor," and an individual "parasite," in the past, in the present, or in the future, known, accounted for accurately, as an example, to demonstrate the principle, and to then demonstrate the expedient, effective, employment of the principle, could help me understand, it seems to me.
Otherwise, in my opinion, I have to disagree with the principle as I see it at the moment.
I disagree with this:
And my ancestors paid dearly for not executing parasites early on.
I, at the moment, agree with this:
So any person who gave in to misunderstanding and become, say, thief - was exiled. Why not killed? Because they were relatives, they were pitied, even murderers and rapists. And they were even given supplies for the road.
I think the door is open both ways, so far, on this point, as far as I am concerned, within the limits of my power to keep the door open both ways, on this point.
Undoubtedly. And if after I can also demote to an animal or even destroy his soul - I will.
I can say, without resort to deception, that I think I understand the concept of becoming animal like, or animalistic, during the time when a blood clot was in my lung, and the pain of breathing caused me to breath faster, and I lost control of breathing, and therefore the pain was out of control, and the result was a panic attack, and then a sense of being animal like, while I paced around the hospital waiting room, waiting for a room.
I think there is a disconnection between thoughtful principle and any effective employment of such thoughts, as time and place converge into that pinpoint called reality. I think that individual people are driven both internally and externally, driven by those internal, and external powers, in a struggle to gain that power to drive thoughts and actions, and it is common to confuse which power dominates the other, until such time as the present becomes the past, and records of events are then available for comparative, accurate, measure.
If, for example, thoughts, and actions, are institutionalized, there is then a record of those thoughts and actions.
A.
Do no harm
B.
Harm
If B is institutionalized, there is a record of B being institutionalized.
If A is institutionalized, there is a record of A being institutionalized.
A can then be accurately measured relative to B.