|Moderated by: Joe Kelley||
|Independence Preferred|| Rate Topic
|Posted: Fri Oct 26th, 2018 08:30 pm||
|In the course of this chapter, as with the others, there are quotes from the historical record and there will be my comments that intend to convey the evidence that convicts beyond reasonable doubt the criminals who acted against all the American people, including every single resident of America known as Indians, including indentured servants from many European dictatorships who ran like runaway slaves to America, including every African kidnaped from Africa and relocated as a victim of criminal slavers here in America, and including every single individual who was a subject of the criminal British Monarchy who had in their own special way declared their independence from that criminal organization.
It is also worth repeating that every single criminal having willfully injured, with malice aforethought, every single individual innocent victim in time and place, is also a victim of their own criminal actions, as scripture suggests, and as those injuries to everyone are comparable to the same criminal having chose a less destructive path.
|Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2018 04:37 pm||
|All the American people are victims of this crime, including every single resident of America known as Indians, including every indentured servant who fled here from many European dictatorships, including every runaway slave who ran to the sanctuary earned in America, including every slave kidnapped from Africa and held in America by criminal slavers here in America, and including every single individual who was a subject of the criminal British Monarchy who had in their own special way declared their independence from that criminal organization.
It is also worth repeating that every single criminal having willfully injured, with malice aforethought, every single individual innocent victim in time and place here in America, is also a victim of their own criminal actions, as scripture suggests, and as those injuries to everyone are comparable to the same criminal having chose a less destructive path. The potential rewards earned by, and benefitting all people, were lost. Spanning out over time, each helpful action spreads like fire to ignite ever more helpful actions. Rather than proceeding on the path of voluntary association for mutual defense, which is the productive path that serves everyone to increase standards of living while at the same time lowering the cost of living, like a rising tide lifting all boats - rather than that path chosen, and taken - the path was turned into the path of subsidized slavery instead. All the benefits realized by all people in peace were set aside when the criminals at this crime scene crushed liberty out of American government. The miracle accounted to all freedom loving people is that despite the turn toward crime made by the government, the people still managed to maintain some semblance of liberty, doing so without the benefit of true government. The process that was truly in place to maintain the home of the brave, and the land of the free, was stomped out of existence by the criminals who took over the voluntary association for our mutual defense, turning that former Federal agreement into a profitable monopoly serving few people who constituted a few special interest groups: Central Banking Frauds, Slavers, Warmongers, and other assorted criminal groups.
Everyone is victim when the power of voluntary mutual defense is corrupted into institutionalized slavery. The crime of turning law into crime negatively affects mankind from the moment the crime has consumed the first calorie from the first victim until the last victim is completely consumed. That same calorie could have been used productively instead of having been consumed destructively. If the crime is not accounted for as a crime, not defended against, and if thereby the criminals are not deterred, and if instead the crime scene goes on perpetually, then the last victim will be the last criminal who dies of natural causes after that last criminal has consumed the second to last victim. The crime of turning voluntary mutual defense - the law - into institutionalized slavery is entropic: it tears apart everything produced in liberty, and eventually the process knowable as institutionalized - subsidized - slavery consumes itself. Where true accountable government could have been maintained the counterfeit version of government feeds upon every producer of value, every source of value, and consumes all value wherever and whenever it can be found by the operators of the fake government power. And while the operators of fake government power employ that power to destroy, that same power is removed from the people, leaving the people defenseless against the fake government power.
The crime scene remains a crime scene until the law is reestablished by the volunteers, who then hold the worst criminals to account first, such as was demonstrated in the American Declaration of Independence. Moving to work on the worst clear and present dangers first moves the true law power in the lawful direction economically; like sweeping the top step first, proceeding down, rather than sweeping the bottom step first. Until the last criminal act by government is no longer a choice made by any potential criminal, government remains a tool used by criminals. To allow the first criminal to use the law to pay for the cost of doing criminal business - subsidized crime - is principally the same failure as allowing the last criminal to perpetrate the same crime: each criminal act is principally the same wrong, morally the same crime. In principle the same failure to defend the first time criminals take-over government is in principle the same failure as the last time no one prevented the crime known as counterfeiting government power, however the first criminal government action leads to exponential increases in the numbers of criminals gaining power with fake government power, while the last criminal action perpetrated by the last criminal government agent will be either the total destruction of our species, or the end of fake government: either total destruction or Liberty results when the last criminal has been deterred and no more crime is thereby profitable. The beginning is a start down a wrong path, and the end of that wrong path is either total destruction or a perishable liberty for all. The first failure leads to an ever expanding Empire power of destruction, and the last failure is the total implosion of the entropic Empire destroying itself. When people no longer allow criminals in government, at all, because we refuse to pay for it, then government becomes true to the purpose that people invent, fund, maintain, and employ government. So long as criminals still infest government, however, government remains, in each case, each time, and each place, a criminal power. The crime scene in this book is the first crime that led all Americans down the path of subsidized slavery, and it has been a brutal struggle since, as people fight each other over control of the criminal government power. While otherwise good people are joining the criminal organization, to cut each other's throats with the criminal law power, liberty loving, free minded people have no voluntary power for our mutual defense, because the government is a counterfeit. Instead of employing government power to stop crime, the patriots are rendered powerless as each attempt to employ the counterfeit government toward accurate accountability, responsibility, and justice, results in greater power transferred to the criminals running the fake government. When the criminals take-over voluntary mutual defense, which is accurately accountable government, there is no law power, as the true law power is counterfeited, and patriots are inspired to reach for a criminal government process in the futile effort to end crime in government. Like fornicating as a method of preserving virginity, the method opposes the goal.
When the law is the power that empowers the criminals at the expense of the victims, the number of guilty criminals will increase, and the number of innocent victims will decrease, as a rule, as a natural function of human existence: without moral, voluntary law, we become like rats on a sinking ship. Each criminal act tends by natural laws to inspire more criminal acts, especially when the law is perverted into subsidized crime, therefore the number of innocent people decline in proportion to the increase in crimes being subsidized: paid for by the innocent victims. Innocent victims are backed into a corner, no where to go, no where to hide, and their only choice then becomes a choice to gain access to the criminal law power, a choice to become one of the criminals, or the alternative is to perish horribly in a torturous hell created by our own capacity for evil, and our own failure to defend against it effectively. What is tax evasion when tax if voluntary? What is tax evasion when tax is a euphemism for extortion?
When the law power is the power that is used by volunteers volunteering to hold the criminals to account, the number of guilty criminals decline. When the worst are held to account first, the greatest power to corrupt is removed first, and no longer is that greatest power creating more guilty criminals out of innocent victims. When the worst are held to account first, the greatest criminal power is no longer consuming innocent victims who refuse to become criminals. So long as at least one innocent victim remains, and children are innocent in fact, so long will the true law power require voluntary actions for defense. The American Declaration of Independence, held the criminal King of England to account for crimes against humanity, that criminal King was one of the worst criminals alive then, and Americans, through the voluntary, agreeable, Declaration of Independence, held the worst criminal, and the worst criminal gang on the planet earth at that time, to an accurate accounting; for the purpose of deterring further crime, peacefully. We as a people, at least those in agreement, were no longer going to support, aid, or abet, that criminal and that criminal gang which was a counterfeit version of government. Instead of supporting counterfeit government which consumes us, Americans volunteered to reestablish a true law power for our mutual defense against all enemies of free people foreign and domestic.
The crimes against humanity perpetrated by the King of England, and all the King's henchmen, included all the crimes known as African Slavery; all the crimes that constituted the African Slave Trade. The crimes known as African Slavery were spelled out in the original Declaration of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson. The criminals in America aiding and abetting the crime of African Slavery were identified in the notes of Thomas Jefferson, on the official records of the first American congress, as Thomas Jefferson blew the whistle on those who were domestic terrorists guilty of the terror of African Slavery. The crimes known as African Slavery constituted a major cause of the Revolution, as explained by one of the major forces behind the Bill of Rights: George Mason. The crimes known as African Slavery were outlawed by Rhode Island, the same state that refused to attend the first Constitutional Convention, the Con Con Con Job that was a crime scene according to the official records recorded into the public domain during that crime. The slavers in the American government, all criminals, took it upon themselves to abuse the power given to them, a power which expressly denied replacing the existing federal government, and those criminals did in fact replace the government. Those criminals thereby abused that power, on the official record going against the limited powers given to them, as those criminal slavers counterfeited the existing government: turning a voluntary association for mutual defense into subsidized slavery of all. Out went the limited, specified, government power, and in place was put absolute power hidden behind a very thin mask, a mask void of principle, a mask constituted out of barefaced lies.
"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter." Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virgina Resolutions and their Legacy, William Watkins.
The original federation of independent people formed into independent families, church groups, towns, cities, counties, and independent states, was a voluntary mutual defense association under the common law with trial by the country, which is trial by jury, which included independent private prosecutors, and independent grand juries. That original federation went into the memory hole when the criminal slave traders took over at that first Constitutional Convention. The Constitutional Convention was a Con Job. The Constitutional Convention, or Con Con, was a Con Job: The Con Con Con Job of 1787.
"One party, whose object and wish it was to abolish and annihilate all State governments, and to bring forward one general government, over this extensive continent, of monarchical nature, under certain restrictions and limitations. Those who openly avowed this sentiment were, it is true, but few; yet it is equally true, Sir, that there were a considerable number, who did not openly avow it, who were by myself, and many others of the convention, considered as being in reality favorers of that sentiment; and, acting upon those principles, covertly endeavoring to carry into effect what they well knew openly and avowedly could not be accomplished." Secret proceedings and debates of the convention assembled at Philadelphia, in the year 1787, Page 13 Luther Martin
Those are the words of someone at the Con Con. Not only were the slavers of Africans present at the Con Con, there were also members of the criminals known as Central Banking Frauds. Not only were there slavers and bank frauds present, but there were also warmongers. Those who cause wars so as to profit from wars, those who lend material support to all sides in war, those who work their victims to gain their victims confidence in the "right" of doing the worst evils imaginable, and evils unimaginable, were present at the Con Con. There and then they, those criminals, created that crime scene known as the Constitutional Convention of 1787. That crime scene, where slavery was thereby presented to the people of America as something worth paying for with National taxes, is the same crime scene that people today are still covering-up, turning a crime scene into something worth supporting: aiding and abetting slavery in fact.
At that crime scene were the worst mutations of human genetics ever to disgrace the human gene pool, and to see this clearly I ask the readers to consider a modern fictional, or imaginary, example of the same crime scene. Imagine scouring under every rock in your town, your county, and your state looking for the worst evil people you can find: human traffickers, rapists, child molesters, serial killers, torturers, and worse evil people, go find them in your mind's eye with your present knowledge of the capacity for human beings to become evil. Go find them and then send them to the next Constitutional Convention. Do that now. That "congress" of evil will divide up what we call posterity. That "congress" of evil will make the necessary plans required to consume our present and our posterity. If you dare claim otherwise, then you are ignoring the facts that matter. When slavery is paid for by the whole number of people, as is a Nation State tax in support of slavery, the whole number of people in that Nation State are slaves, or criminals. Claiming innocence is a false claim, the slavers cannot proceed without the flow of power flowing from the slaves, and if the slaves do not resist, they are victims failing their duty to resist, failing their duty to defend themselves and posterity, and if they receive bounties, stipends, emoluments, privileges, favors, profits, benefits, dividends, rewards, etc., they are then criminals in fact, having documented the fact with a trail of accurately accountable evidence. The criminal version of Uncle Sam can't remain a criminal without an army of Uncle Toms.
"The abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison thought the U.S. Constitution was the result of a terrible bargain between freedom and slavery. Calling the Constitution a "covenant with death" and "an agreement with Hell," he refused to participate in American electoral politics because to do so meant supporting "the pro-slavery, war sanctioning Constitution of the United States." Instead, under the slogan "No Union with Slaveholders," the Garrisonians repeatedly argued for a dissolution of the Union.
"Part of Garrison's opposition to continuing the Union stemmed from a desire to avoid the corruption that came from participating in a government created by the proslavery Constitution. But this position was also at least theoretically pragmatic. The Garrisonians were convinced that the legal protection of slavery in the Constitution made political activity futile, while support for the Constitution merely strengthened the stranglehold slavery had on America. In 1845 Wendell Phillips pointed out that in the years since the adoption of the Constitution, Americans had witnessed "the slaves trebling in numbers—slaveholders monopolizing the offices and dictating the policy of the Government-prostituting the strength and influence of the Nation to the support of slavery here and elsewhere—trampling on the rights of the free States, and making the courts of the country their tools." Phillips argued that this experience proved "that it is impossible for free and slave States to unite on any terms, without all becoming partners in the guilt and responsible for the sin of slavery." Garrison's Constitution, The Covenant with Death and How It Was Made, By Paul Finkelman
Before the criminals took over the government in 1787, gradually gaining the confidence of their subjects subjected to the lies they told, the people had a momentary chance to nurture true rule of law, and this is not difficult to imagine. This is no more difficult to imagine that the previous thought experiment concerning a second Con Con. The people allowed the worst evil people to assemble covertly into secret proceedings, dividing up the people all over America, to set each individual against each other, while the criminal perpetrators of the Crime of the Millennium coveted profits to be made on the backs of their slaves, profits that remain unaccounted for accurately: a complete failure in the absence of the true law power. That was the first Con Con Con Job, and what in your mind do you think will be the result of a second Con Con Con Job? Is that hard to imagine? If that is not hard to imagine, then it ought not be hard to image a historical trial that ought to have been done, and while contemplating these matters that so dearly affect our temporal salvation, consider constructing a modern trial accounting for current criminals on top of the current version of fake government in America. How hard can that be when the current "leader of the free world" today promised such an accounting if elected instead of his rival Hilary Clinton.
"She has to go to jail." Donald Trump, Lakeland, Fla., Oct. 12, 2016
Had the people employed rule of law, instead of letting rule of law slip through our fingers in 1789, it is as likely as not that the worst criminals would have been held to account sooner, rather than never. Imagine a possible victim, a former slave, a member of the Indian Nations, an indentured servant, a Revolutionary War veteran, any of which could have placed into the public record transcripts transcribed during a trial by the country, a case involving any of those criminals at the first Con Con. If you cannot imagine what might have been transcribed into the Public Record during such a trial by jury, then consider the benefit realized in reading actual trial transcripts of a similar nature, such as a resent trial involving the conspiracy murder of Martin Luther King Jr.
THE COURT: Let me ask you, do all of you
agree with this verdict?
THE JURY: Yes (In unison).
THE COURT: In answer to the
question did Loyd Jowers participate in a
conspiracy to do harm to Dr. Martin Luther
King, your answer is yes.
Do you also find that others, including governmental agencies, were parties to this conspiracy as alleged by
the defendant? Your answer to that one is
And the total amount of damages
you find for the plaintiffs entitled to is
one hundred dollars. Is that your verdict?
THE JURY: Yes (In unison).
Millions of not yet enslaved Africans, millions of not yet slaughtered Indians, millions of not yet killed or mutilated Soldiers in every war, including the pogrom that has been falsely called the Civil War, could have been protected, served, and afforded true rule of law instead of that horrible fate they suffered under the criminal Nation State created in 1789.
All that had to be done then, is the same actions that must be done now, for the whole people, meaning everyone, to protect and serve ourselves and posterity, protecting us from criminals running a criminal government. Each individual in turn, ought to volunteer, and do our duty, which is to hold the worst criminals first to account, and that is done through rule of law, such as the common law, with independent grand juries, and trial juries. To claim that someone in government is beyond the laws that they claim to be their source of authority is a modern invention, a false claim, and a confession of criminality in fact. If someone claims to be immune from prosecution, according to the law they claim that gives them authority to make such a claim, then said claim is inculpatory evidence proving the fact of a crime, a crime such as treason. Treason against the whole people, is treason against liberty, which is treason against a republican form of government, and it is also treason against democracy. How can it be any clearer for a criminal to confess their criminality than for said criminal to claim to be above the law which is the same law that they also claim to be their source of authority?
"Every State shall abide by the determination of the United States in Congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them. And the Articles of this Confederation shall be inviolably observed by every State, and the Union shall be perpetual; nor shall any alteration at any time hereafter be made in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a Congress of the United States, and be afterwards confirmed by the legislatures of every State."
The Con Con was a trap set by criminal members of congress, and in order to setup the Con Con, to remove and replace the existing federation, the criminals had to lie, commit fraud, commit treason, in order to get people to assemble under a false claim of altering the existing federation. Rhode Island refused to attend the Con Con so as to remove the ability to lawfully alter the Articles of Confederation, having no clue yet as to the true intent of the criminals perpetrating the fraudulent Con Con. The criminals in congress, and the criminals pulling the strings of the criminal congressmen, intended to replace with a counterfeit version the existing federation of Independent States. If there is no agreement by congress, as the document giving authority to congress states, then there is no power to alter the Articles of Confederation; but altering the agreement to form a voluntary mutual defense association was a lie, a rouse, it was the bait in a trap, a trap set by the Warmonger Party, which was the Slaver Party, which was the Banking Fraud Party, which was the Nationalist Party, which is also the Party that used the false name Federalist Party. If those in congress had not been given any power to replace, let alone counterfeit, the existing federation, then they had no lawful power to do so, even if the criminals found enough fellow criminals to agree to perpetrate a fraud upon the American people, and posterity. Even if criminals gave the original, grass-roots, organic federal government the power to perpetrate a fraud upon the American people, and posterity, the fact that fraud is a crime constitutes the counterfeiting of the federal government as a crime.
December 7, 1787
"Rhode Island Is Right!
"The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous. The General Assembly of the state of Rhode Island has prevented the further importation of Negroes, and have made a law by which all blacks born in that state after March, 1784, are absolutely and at once free.
"They have fully complied with the recommendations of Congress in regard to the late treaty of peace with Great Britain, and have passed an act declaring it to be the law of the land. They have never refused their quota of taxes demanded by Congress, excepting the five per cent impost, which they considered as a dangerous tax, and for which at present there is perhaps no great necessity, as the western territory, of which a part has very lately been sold at a considerable price, may soon produce an immense revenue; and, in the interim, Congress may raise in the old manner the taxes which shall be found necessary for the support of the government.
"The state of Rhode Island refused to send delegates to the Federal Convention, and the event has manifested that their refusal was a happy one as the new constitution, which the Convention has proposed to us, is an elective monarchy, which is proverbially the worst government. This new government would have been supported at a vast expense, by which our taxes - the right of which is solely vested in Congress, (a circumstance which manifests that the various states of the union will be merely corporations) - would be doubled or trebled.
"The liberty of the press is not stipulated for, and therefore may be invaded at pleasure. The supreme continental court is to have, almost in every case, "appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact," which signifies, if there is any meaning in words, the setting aside the trial by jury. Congress will have the power of guaranteeing to every state a right to import Negroes for twenty one years, by which some of the states, who have now declined that iniquitous traffic, may re-enter into it - for the private laws of every state are to submit to the superior jurisdiction of Congress. A standing army is to be kept on foot, by which the vicious, the sycophantick, and the time-serving will be exalted, and the brave, the patriotic, and the virtuous will be depressed.
"The writer, therefore, thinks it the part of wisdom to abide, like the state of Rhode Island, by the old articles of confederation, which, if re-examined with attention, we shall find worthy of great regard; that we should give high praise to the manly and public spirited sixteen members, who lately seceded from our house of Assembly [in Pennsylvania]; and that we should all impress with great care, this truth on our minds - That it is very easy to change a free government into an arbitrary one, but that it is very difficult to convert tyranny into freedom."
People volunteer to create and maintain voluntary government, and among the actions performed by people who volunteer to create and maintain voluntary government is the act of documenting agreements made by those who volunteer, for the public to know precisely what is being done by the volunteers, in the name of the whole people. If there is corruption, then those who perpetrate corruption will be documented in fact, and if there is corruption in the form of destroying evidence of corruption, then the destruction of inculpatory evidence may be a more difficult crime to prove because the evidence proving the crime is destroyed, but that is precisely the problem: criminals do not obey moral laws, and they lie, they distort, they cover-up, and they make - as a rule - it difficult for the volunteers to defend against deceptive criminals.
"Resolved, That the proceeding Constitution be laid before the United States in Congress assembled, that is should afterwards be submitted to a Convention of Delegates, chosen in each State by the People thereof, under the Recommendation of its Legislature, for their Assent and Ratification; and that each Convention assenting to, and ratifying the Same, should give Notice thereof to the United States in Congress assembled.”
The Federal congress of the United States of America had to agree to alterations, then after agreeing to alterations those proposed alterations are then sent to each independent State government for ratification, or rejection. The power to replace the existing federation did not exist, not without deception, not without perpetrating treason upon the American people: treason upon free people in a perishable liberty.
Is there documentation of an agreement by Congress to replace the Articles of Confederation? That is an important question. If there is no such agreement, then the fact that the federal government was replaced, not altered, but replaced, is inculpatory evidence proving the fact that the crime was perpetrated, the smoking gun is the second, counterfeit, constitution. Who perpetrated the crime? Where is the evidence that proves beyond reasonable doubt that some people in congress agreed to step outside the law in order to replace - counterfeit - the federal law? Where is the evidence accurately accounting for specific people stepping from a solid foundation, stepping from the voluntary agreement on paper, stepping from the agreement giving these people their power to govern, and where is the evidence documenting specific people having stepped onto the beginning of a mountain of lies? Where is the evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that specific people in American history willfully, and with malice aforethought, perpetrated the treason that lead to a mountain of horrors and terrors constituted from present and future threats of aggressive violence upon innocent people: obey or suffer? Where is the evidence documenting the names of the criminals responsible for, and accurately accountable for the piles of not yet murdered innocent people: terrified, tortured, mass murdered people; a pile of bodies not yet murdered, each victim having an individual name, a pile constituting a mountain of innocent mass murder victims, all done under the color of law: where is the evidence concerning this crime scene?
Consider the fact that those criminals set in motion the creation of a fraudulent central bank, the subsidization of African Slavery with a National Tax, the removal of trial by jury: replacing trial by jury with summary justice kangaroo courts of legal extortion, and setting in motion what is now known as the military industrial complex: warmongering. The warmongers wiped out the Indian Nations, rather than incorporating them into the voluntary union for mutual defense, by some means that was at least possible under the true voluntary Federation. The warmongers restarted the war with England, so as to restart the central bank fraud that was removed by Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic Republican Party. The Democratic Republican Party was formed in opposition to the Nationalist Party. The Nationalist Party is the party which hid their evil behind a false label of Federalist. The War of 1812 was perpetrated so as to reestablish the American version of a fraudulent Central Bank. The warmongers running the Subsidized Slavery Government instigated the pogrom that became known as the Civil War; a culling of American patriots under the ruse of freeing the slaves, the same slaves that were not yet slaves at the time the criminals counterfeiting the federal government. All of that could have been prevented, had not the criminals took-over the federation, replacing the federation with a Nation State in 1789. All of those crimes launched as a result of the Con Con crime could have been accounted for as crimes, had not the criminals pulled the plug on our trial by the people, our trial by the country, our common law trial by jury, our truth based due process, a process of equal protection under the law: true, accurately accountable justice.
"On motion of Mr. [Edward] Carrington seconded by Mr. [William] Bingham the motion of Mr. [Abraham] Clark was postponed to take into consideration the following motion viz “Congress proceeded to the consideration of the Constitution for the United States by the late Convention held in the City of Philadelphia and thereupon resolved That Congress do agree thereto and that it be recommended to the legislatures of the several states to cause conventions to be held as speedily as may be to the end that the same may be adopted ratified and confirmed."
When did the word alteration become the word replace? A Constitution existed, so as to enumerate the powers of a federal government, and in those power is listed a power to alter, not replace, the existing federal government. Those people, on that official record, agreed to replace the voluntary mutual defense association, the federation, with an all powerful Nation State Constitution: a counterfeit version of a Federation of Independent States.
Who, exactly, replaced the existing federation at that time, in that place, replacing the existing federation with a proposal to empower, with absolute - dictatorial powers - a corporate nation state - a legal fiction - instead of a voluntary federation of independent states under the common law?
|Current time is 12:58 am|
|Power Independence > Book > Book Work > Independence Preferred||Top|