Power Independence Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

 Moderated by: Joe Kelley
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Exile  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Wed Sep 17th, 2014 03:19 pm
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6353
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Linking work

http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/monday-9-17-2014#comment-2468

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Sep 17th, 2014 03:21 pm
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6353
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/files/mondayrecording/14-09-15.mp3
I managed to get to Time 20:49
In Scripture are words that speak of hypocrites.
Those who claim that other people are ignorant, while their ignorance is overwhelming, suffocating, and a BAR on learning true and accurate measures of reality, is striking at that point in that Conference call.
There will be a network that will replace the current 911 network or the people who refuse to see the fraud that glues the current 911 network together will consume all the people in that false network.
The network that will glue together those who will find the truth in every case where there is conflict between an accused and an accuser, so as to know, beyond reasonable doubt the precise demarcation line between an innocent victim and a guilty criminal, will be open, honest, true, perception of accurately perceived facts in each case of conflict.
http://biblehub.com/matthew/7-5.htm
"You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."
http://biblehub.com/matthew/7-12.htm
"So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."
http://biblehub.com/luke/6-31.htm
"Do to others as you would have them do to you."
Show me, please, the ignorance that covers me up in a room of darkness, please. I know I am in darkness, even during a very hot, summer, sunny, day in the Mojave Desert California.
Here is the plank in our eye:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/files/marshal/1%20US%20Marshals%2...
"As part of the famous Compromise of 1850, Congress passed one of the most roundly hated and violently opposed laws in American history. The Fugitive Slave Act required U.S. Marshals in the north to return escaped slaves to their masters in the South. Northern abolitionists, who were intent on abolishing the institution of slavery, turned on the Marshals in a number of slave rescue cases.
But the Marshals, regardless of their personal feelings, had no choice. The Constitution itself required the free states to return fugitive slaves. The Fugitive Slave Law merely implemented that Constitutional provision. To deny the law, even a hated law, meant a denial of the Constitution itself. The Marshals enforced the law."
The ignorance in your eye is founded upon a very effective fraud that occurred in Philadelphia in 1787, as a matter of demonstrable fact.
Refusal of acknowledgement of the demonstrable facts of the matter constitutes willful (mens rea) choice, by those who refuse to acknowledge demonstrable facts of the matter, to remain ignorant.
Many forms of knowledge must refused by people, as a matter of demonstrable fact, for there is only so much time during the life of people; which is basic economic knowledge, which can be refused by people as people remain ignorant of basic economics too.
To profess to know basic economic facts while refusing to acknowledge basic economic facts, and to profess to teach basic economics while refusing to acknowledge basic economic facts, while choosing to refuse to acknowledge basic economic facts goes beyond ignorance and moves decidedly into the realm of willful deception.
The same accounting process works for those who falsely profess basic knowledge of law.
Rather than profess to know, how about asking for help in finding precisely where deception is firmly stuck in my own eye, before I take one more step in proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, just how large the plank is as the plank of that Fraud of 1787 continues to be picked up by people and people stick that plank in their own eyes, and they do so for reasons that only they know, and only they can confess overtly, or only they will confess in time as their actions will speak louder than their words.
"So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."
Who said those words?
So fearless leader John refuses to recognize the extreme wrong of publishing some of the worst "legal advice," ever to be voluntarily voiced by a living soul on this planet, and that fact is bearing down on my soul right now.
On this Web Page is this:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/files/marshal/1%20US%20Marshals%2...
"As part of the famous Compromise of 1850, Congress passed one of the most roundly hated and violently opposed laws in American history. The Fugitive Slave Act required U.S. Marshals in the north to return escaped slaves to their masters in the South. Northern abolitionists, who were intent on abolishing the institution of slavery, turned on the Marshals in a number of slave rescue cases.
But the Marshals, regardless of their personal feelings, had no choice. The Constitution itself required the free states to return fugitive slaves. The Fugitive Slave Law merely implemented that Constitutional provision. To deny the law, even a hated law, meant a denial of the Constitution itself. The Marshals enforced the law."
Here is economic, free market, competition in the market of legal advice:
http://biblehub.com/matthew/7-5.htm
"You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."
http://biblehub.com/matthew/7-12.htm
"So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."
http://biblehub.com/luke/6-31.htm
"Do to others as you would have them do to you."
So you, you, and you, all of y'all, WILL choose the best advice as you, all of y'all, move in time and place on your paths.
If the new net-workers, those who willfully connect into the new network, and work, are willfully choosing to replace the current 911 network with a carbon copy of the current 911 network, out with the old bosses, and in with the new ones, then you WILL get what you pay for, as basic economic facts WILL set in.
If, on the other hand, the new net-workers willfully choose to acknowledge the clearly demonstrated factual account of precisely when the criminals took over, as those criminals made slavery "legal," and as those criminals issued criminal orders to be obeyed without question, and that is the stuff that bound those people to their network, of their choosing, and we the people reject such willful deception as our binding glue, in our network of our choice, then we the people WILL get what we pay for in that case, as we move down that opposite path.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Sep 17th, 2014 03:22 pm
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6353
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Repeating, reinforcing, cluing in, offering, and offering information according to the advice found in scripture, so as to plead, with utmost sincerity, please, please, show me the plank in my own eye, in this case, or in any case, there are two cases afoot here and now.
1.
"Legalized" Human Trafficking starting in 1787 in Philadelphia as the criminals took over a working federation of republics.
2.
"Legally" setting aside Trial by Jury starting in 1787 in Philadelphia as the criminals took over a working federation of republics.
Words mean precisely what the user of the word intends the words to mean, and if you do not know that much, then you may want to know that much too.
In the Declaration of Independence the following words are reinforced if not repeated verbatim.
"So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."
What were the people called when the people chose to acknowledge the fact that Human Trafficking was not legal?
Words convey intending meaning.
"So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."
If you want to be a slave, then invest in Legalized Human Trafficking.
Call is slavery and your fraud does not work for you very well, does it?
They are slaves, not me, so call them ignorant, not me, call them "other" people, but do not call them slaves, because that word means something to the slaves who know they are slaves.
What were "they" called when they opposed the obvious fraud at work when the frauds made slavery "legal"?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Sep 17th, 2014 03:23 pm
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6353
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
How about a hint?
If you have not guessed yet, perhaps because the plank in your eye casts a very deep shadow in your thinking, there is a possible place where I can find useful meaning in words, and in that useful meaning in words the answer to the following question can be found.
What where "they" called when "they" exposed the fraud of making Human Trafficking "legal," in the criminal minds of the people who willfully invested into abject criminal enslavement of people by people for the exclusive fun, and the exclusive profit, of the so called "masters," at the cost of the slaves that were enslaved by those who were glued together in that network of institutionalized slavery?
Source:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html
Quote:_____________________________
...it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it...
_________________________________

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Sep 17th, 2014 03:23 pm
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
Joe Kelley
Administrator
 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6353
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
The question:
What where "they" called when "they" exposed the fraud of making Human Trafficking "legal," in the criminal minds of the people who willfully invested into abject criminal enslavement of people by people for the exclusive fun, and the exclusive profit, of the so called "masters," at the cost of the slaves that were enslaved by those who were glued together in that network of institutionalized slavery?
The question reduced to a sound bite:
What did good people call good people, or, on the other hand, what label was chosen as a label to brand the people who worked to end institutionalized slavery?
Hint 2:
http://blackeyepress.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/stephen-pearl-andrews-1812...
"He went to Louisiana at age 18 and studied and practiced law there; appalled by slavery, he became an abolitionist. Having moved to Texas in 1839, he and his family were almost killed because of his abolitionist lectures and had to flee 1843."
When the criminals take over they invent words that work like magic upon those who willfully follow orders without questioning the right or wrong of such willful choices made by such people as those who are driven to act as they follow deceivers using deception as a very effective weapon of mass destruction.
What were good people called when good people set about abolishing criminal orders issued by criminals who took over government?
Rebels?
Insurgents?
What is that word I am looking for?
What is the punishment for speaking out against the frauds who took over?
What is the punishment for daring to speak out against those who are deceived by those frauds who took over?
In my case the punishment is exile.
I can easily bear that punishment. I can still ask for help, repeatedly asking, relentlessly asking, in the hope that someone will offer generous help in return for my efforts at abolishing deception in our networks of our efforts to return, not set aside, trial by jury, into general use by good people for good people.
On this Web Page is the following link:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/anti-federalist-papers
The next quote shows, beyond reasonable doubt, that people in at least one Republic in a working Federation, where good people, not abolitionists, people were good people, doing good things, as they acknowledged true law, and as they exposed the frauds for what the frauds were perpetrating in time and place.
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/anti-federalist-papers
Quote:______________________________
Antifederalist No. 15
RHODE ISLAND IS RIGHT!
This essay appeared in The Massachusetts Gazette, December 7, 1787, as reprinted From The Freeman's Journal; (Or, The North-America Intelligencer?)
The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous. The General Assembly of the state of Rhode Island has prevented the further importation of Negroes, and have made a law by which all blacks born in that state after March, 1784, are absolutely and at once free.
They have fully complied with the recommendations of Congress in regard to the late treaty of peace with Great Britain, and have passed an act declaring it to be the law of the land. They have never refused their quota of taxes demanded by Congress, excepting the five per cent impost, which they considered as a dangerous tax, and for which at present there is perhaps no great necessity, as the western territory, of which a part has very lately been sold at a considerable price, may soon produce an immense revenue; and, in the interim, Congress may raise in the old manner the taxes which shall be found necessary for the support of the government.
The state of Rhode Island refused to send delegates to the Federal Convention, and the event has manifested that their refusal was a happy one as the new constitution, which the Convention has proposed to us, is an elective monarchy, which is proverbially the worst government. This new government would have been supported at a vast expense, by which our taxes-the right of which is solely vested in Congress, (a circumstance which manifests that the various states of the union will be merely corporations) -- would be doubled or trebled. The liberty of the press is not stipulated for, and therefore may be invaded at pleasure. The supreme continental court is to have, almost in every case, "appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact," which signifies, if there is any meaning in words, the setting aside the trial by jury.
_______________________________________
There is intended meaning in words. If the meaning is intentionally false, then the source of the words spoken, or written, is a deceiver intending to deceive someone.
When does the master of deception become the slave of his own deceptions?
Just ask, and you may hear silence, or if you hear more deception, then that source confesses those answers.
Exile?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 09:29 am  
Power Independence > Liberty Day Challenge 2015 > Updates > Exile Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems