View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Thu Oct 11th, 2018 04:04 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6369
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
1. Supreme court is a sham:

"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor." George Mason against the Con Job Constitution of 1787

2. Constitution is "old document" and meaningless

That "Constitution" is inculpatory evidence that proves beyond reasonable doubt that the slave trader criminals took over the American Federation and turned that voluntary mutual defense association (under the common law) into a profitable monopoly (subsidized slavery under the color of law).

To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802

"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property."

3. Electoral college must go

The process by which each successive dictor is placed in command of the dictatorship is determined by the dictators, not their slaves.

4. Guilty until proven innocent

Prosecutor's Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Lisa M. Kurcias

"The Supreme Court held that the suppression of favorable evidence violated Brady's rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 69
69. Id. at 86. The Due Process Clause states that "[n]o State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." U.S. Const. amend. XIV."

"While the Supreme Court requires prosecutors to disclose certain evidence to the defense, consequences for withholding such evidence do not exist in the criminal justice system."
87. See Weeks, supra note 78, at 878 ("[T]he prospect of a civil suit under federal law for a Brady violation simply does not exist. We will have to look elsewhere to discover the incentive for prosecutors to comply with their constitutional obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence.").

"In fact, the Supreme Court has granted prosecutors absolute immunity from civil liability for failure to disclose exculpatory evidence.88"
88. See Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 430 (1976); see also Bruce A. Green, Policing Federal Prosecutors: Do Too Many Regulators Produce Too Little Enforcement?, 8 St. Thomas L. Rev. 69, 79 n.54 (1995) [hereinafter Green, Enforcement] (stating that "prosecutors have absolute immunity for misconduct related to their prosecutorial function"). "

https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3689&context=flr

No, the common law includes such principles as trial by jury, which is trial by the country, whereby the whole country is represented in a randomly selected jury, and no force of government can be set in motion without the say so of the people in their tribunals, which means that the whole country of people are in charge: not agents of the government. The common law includes the presumption of innocence before the determination, by the people in their juries, of any proof - beyond reasonable doubt - of guilt. The dictators - as a rule - presume themselves to be absolutely immune from any liability whatsoever: just ask them and they will confirm this fact.

As to the rest of the list of evidence of brainwashing: controlled opposition is another routine process employed by dictators running a dictatorship, as the dictators can spend any amount of COST so long as the slaves keeping bearing it.