|View single post by Joe Kelley|
|Posted: Tue Jan 2nd, 2018 10:18 am||
|Next the Confederate Party claims that the states have governed themselves into an odious debt.
That is demonstrably false. In the first place a State cannot do anything, as it is a demonstrable fact that people do things, such as borrow something from someone else.
If the Confederate Party is unaware of the work done to expose Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, work done by individuals like Walter Burien, then the people at the Confederate Party are in the dark, and they are making decisions based upon falsified accounting records: fraudulent public financial accounts.
If the criminals had not taken over in 1789, putting in place a Kangaroo Court System of Legalized Plunder, then the following would be an example of the law of the land rendering an accurate verdict concerning the financial crimes that were also created in America in 1789, with the Slave Trading Constitution that set the stage for The First Bank of The United States FRAUD, and all the criminal powers required to enforce it.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
First National Bank of Montogmery, Plaintiff
Jerome Daly, Defendant.
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing.
Next from the Confederate Party is a reference to something called Charter of the American Continent. I see no link to that document, and I found no link to that document when I tried a Google Search for it. I can say this much about the words that I can read in the YouTube presentation of the Confederate Party: they are not claiming that Slavery is Legal, which is what the so called Constitution of 1787/89 did, so in that way the Charter of the American Continent is qualitatively better than the Slave Trading Constitution of 1787/89 when The Bill of Rights fails to Amend it, in a functional, powerful, way: in reality.
Next is a to do list:
The basic recovery plan is simple.
1. The people form a compact within the county and declare "Home Rule".
2. The county government assembly is proclaimed into existence by publication as existing within The United States of America. Each county should have its own home rule assembly.
3. Then the State can sign onto the charter of the American Continent.
4. The State is independent, within the original Union with The United States of America as host.
5. No more debt, no more interest, no more wars, no more conflicts.
6. The States even have the option of operating under the U.S. Constitution. The signing of the charter of the American Continent does not nullify and void the States' obligations under the U.S. constitution if the State chooses to remain under that obligation.
That is not simple. In the first place the plan is a recreation of a different oligarchy whereby the only power retained by the whole body of people is this power to vote for whichever oppressor manages to buy a ticket on the ballot. There is no mention of the law of the land, the common law, which empowers a check upon any claim of lawful authority whatsoever, in each individual, in each county, in each State, in which the States are formed into a Federation of States: a voluntary mutual defense association.
So, why bother with this type of out with the old bosses and in with the new bosses when it remains an INVOLUNTARY ASSSOCIATION FOR THE CRIMINALS AT THE EXPENSE OF THE VICTIMS UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW? Why is it a given that criminal rule must be covered up with false claims of lawful authority? The answer is found in the routine practice of torture. The criminals find a need to torture people into submission, to torture people into making false confessions, because the criminals would simply be getting off on torturing innocent victims, having no other reason than it pleases them to see innocent victims in pain, if not for the requirement of COLOR of law. The criminals must FORCE FAKE "voluntary" compliance out of their victims, so as to maintain the cover of counterfeit lawful authority. Confess, they say, confess so that our lawful authority remains in force. Without the counterfeit confessions, all the authority is merely criminal power exerted by criminals in fact.